Physical Activity Profile of Old Order Amish, Mennonite, and Contemporary Children
Physical Activity Profile of Old Order Amish, Mennonite, and Contemporary Children
复制标题
DOI：
10.1249/mss.0b013e3181b3afd2
复制
发表时间：
2010-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bassett, David R., Jr.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Esliger, Dale W.;Tremblay, Mark S.;Bassett, David R., Jr.
首页--期刊主要分类--期刊细介绍--期刊题录与文摘--期刊详细文摘内容旧秩序阿米什人、门诺派和当代儿童的体力活动概况。地中海医院。准备好了。《体育运动》，第42卷，第2期，第296-303页，2010年。目的：探讨现代性对儿童体育活动行为(如强度和时间)的影响。方法：将8-13岁生活在传统生活方式的儿童(旧式阿米什人[OOA]，n=68；旧式门诺派[OOM]，n=120)与现代生活方式的儿童(萨斯喀彻温省农村[RSK]，n=132；城市萨斯喀彻温省[Usk]，n=93)进行比较。使用Actigraph 7164加速计对连续7天的体力活动进行客观评估。使用定制软件将原始加速度计数据简化为标准化结果变量。结果：在工作日，各生活方式组(OOA>、OOM>、USK>、RSK)的中等体力活动存在组间差异。周末，在不同的生活方式组(OOA=OOM>；USK=RSK)之间，适度体力活动方面的群体差异持续存在。在学校时间里，所有小组都有相似的活动和不活动时间；然而，它们的大小不同，OOA和OOM都更久坐和更活跃。与在校儿童相比，OOA和OOM儿童的课外久坐时间减少了44%，而RSK和Usk儿童只减少了15%。结论：尽管这些数据是横截面的，但这些数据表明，与前几代人的生活方式相比，当代/现代生活与中等强度和剧烈运动的体力活动水平较低。分析传统生活方式群体(如OOA和OOM)的体育活动和不活动模式，可以提供对促进健康所必需的体育活动的数量和质量的宝贵见解。
ESLIGER, D. W., M. S. TREMBLAY, J. L. COPELAND, J. D. BARNES, G. E. HUNTINGTON, and D. R. BASSETT JR. Physical Activity Profile of Old Order Amish, Mennonite, and Contemporary Children. Med. Set. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 296-303, 2010. Purpose: This study explored the influence of modernity on the physical activity behaviors (e.g., intensity and timing) of children. Methods: Children aged 8-13 yr living a traditional lifestyle (Old Order Amish [OOA], n = 68; Old Order Mennonite [OOM], n = 120) were compared with children living a contemporary lifestyle (rural Saskatchewan [RSK], n = 132; urban Saskatchewan [USK], n = 93). Physical activity was objectively assessed for seven consecutive days using Actigraph 7164 accelerometers. Custom software was used to reduce the raw accelerometer data into standardized outcome variables. Results: On weekdays, there were group differences in moderate physical activity between all lifestyle groups (OOA > OOM > USK > RSK). On the weekend, the group differences in moderate physical activity persisted between, but not within, lifestyle groups (OOA = OOM > USK = RSK). During school hours, all groups had similar activity and inactivity periods; however, they differed in magnitude, with the OOA and OOM being both more sedentary and more active. In comparison with the children in school, the OOA and the OOM children had 44% lower sedentary time out of school compared with only 15% lower for RSK and USK children. Conclusions: Although cross sectional, these data suggest that contemporary/modern living is associated with lower levels of moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity compared with lifestyles representative of earlier generations. Analyzing the physical activity and inactivity patterns of traditional lifestyle groups such as the OOA and the OOM can provide valuable insight into the quantity and quality of physical activity necessary to promote health.