Recognition memory and attentional selection: serial scanning is not enough.
Recognition memory and attentional selection: serial scanning is not enough.
复制标题
识别记忆和注意力选择：串行扫描是不够的。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-1523.12.4.476
复制
发表时间：
1986
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hoffman,JE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eriksen,BA;Eriksen,CW;Hoffman,JE
在2个实验中，共54名研究生或本科生，使用多达10个字母的记忆集，采用反应竞争范式来研究外部视觉刺激干扰或影响记忆搜索过程的程度。假设如果选择性注意可以排除Sternberg型（S。斯滕贝格;参见记录1966-10810-001）存储器比较过程，则对于反应时间（RT）-组大小函数而言，截距将增加，但斜率没有增加。这一结果得到了。然而，一个很大的差异，积极和消极的设置目标的反应时间被发现时，伴随的噪音字母表示竞争的反应，而不是当他们表示相同的反应作为目标。有人建议，这意味着快速识别的目标和噪声的性质，独立的串行比较过程。一个修改的双重过程模型（JF Juola等;见记录1972-00186-001），其中刺激激活熟悉度值独立于记忆搜索的建议，以解释这些结果。(24参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In 2 experiments with a total of 54 graduate or undergraduate students, using memory sets of up to 10 letters, the response competition paradigm was employed to investigate the extent to which extraneous visual stimuli interfere with or affect the process of memory search. It was assumed that if selective attention could exclude the effect of noise letters from a Sternberg-type (S. Sternberg; see record 1966-10810-001) memory comparison process, then there would be an increase in intercept for the reaction time (RT)–set size functions but no increase in slope. This result was obtained. However, a large difference in response times to both positive and negative set targets were found when the accompanying noise letters indicated a competing response, as opposed to when they indicated the same response as the target. It is suggested that this implies rapid identification of the nature of both target and noise, independent of a serial comparison process. A modification of a dual process model (JF Juola et al; see record 1972-00186-001) in which stimuli activate a familiarity value independent of memory search was suggested to account for these results.(24 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)