Reflection On Action in NIME Research: Two Complementary Perspectives
Reflection On Action in NIME Research: Two Complementary Perspectives
复制标题
对 NIME 研究行动的反思：两种互补的观点
DOI：
10.5281/zenodo.1176006
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Andrew Johnston
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Benjamin Carey;Andrew Johnston
本文讨论了基于实践的研究与互动系统的现场表演的背景下。基于实践的研究进行了深入的概述，与关键概念和方法的背景下相对于在NIME领域的研究。我们专注于两种方法，这两种方法都涉及记录，检查和反思新作品创作中涉及的人和人工制品的现实世界行为和经验。第一种方法主要基于个人表演者/开发者的反馈（自动民族志），第二种方法基于访谈和观察。沿着这两种方法的理论基础，以及应用它们的研究结果，以说明和探索两者的特点。挑战，包括平衡严谨性和相关性的困难，以及对创造性实践产生负面影响的风险，以及潜在的贝内。
This paper discusses practice-based research in the context of live performance with interactive systems. Practice-based research is outlined in depth, with key concepts and approaches contextualised with respect to research in the NIME field. We focus on two approaches, both of which are concerned with documenting, examining and reflecting on the real-world behaviours and experiences of people and artefacts involved in the creation of new works. The first approach is primarily based on reflections by an individual performer/developer (auto-ethnography) and the second on interviews and observations. The rationales for both approaches are presented along with findings from research which applied them in order to illustrate and explore the characteristics of both. Challenges, including the difficulty of balancing rigour and relevance and the risks of negatively impacting on creative practices are articulated, as are the potential benefits.