Assessment of Research Ethics Knowledge of Pediatricians.
Assessment of Research Ethics Knowledge of Pediatricians.
复制标题
评估儿科医生的研究伦理知识。
DOI：
10.1177/2333794x231224989
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Munir, Kerim
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Salayev, Kamran;Aslanova, Ulviyya;Guliyeva, Narmin;Geraybeyli, Geray;Munir, Kerim
目标.评估儿童保健专业人员的伦理知识。方法.我们将儿科住院医师伦理知识测试（TREK-P）翻译成中文，并将其用于：（i）三年级医学生（n = 21），（ii）儿科住院医师（n = 24），（iii）执业儿科医生（n = 21），以及（iv）参加Fogarty国际中心/国家卫生研究院（Fogarty/NIH）R25研究伦理教育计划的研究员（n = 9）。评价各组间TREK-P评分的差异以及TREK-P评分与其他因素的相关性。结果研究员的得分明显高于其他组（P = .006）。其他3组之间无显著差异。在儿科医生和研究员的联合组中，先前的伦理培训是与TREK-P评分较高相关的唯一因素（P <0.05）。结论.研究员的较高分数支持研究生Fogarty/NIH研究伦理培训计划的有效性。
Objectives. To assess knowledge of ethics knowledge among child healthcare professionals. Methods. We translated the Test of Residents’ Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics (TREK-P) in Azeri and administered it to: (i) third-year medical students (n = 21), (ii) pediatrics residents (n = 24), (iii) practicing pediatricians (n = 21), and (iv) fellows (n = 9) who participated in a Fogarty International Center/National Institute of Health (Fogarty/NIH) R25 research ethics education program. The difference in the TREK-P score between the groups and the correlation between the TREK-P score and other factors were evaluated. Results. The fellows scored significantly higher than the other groups (P = .006). There was no significant difference between the other 3 groups. Within a joined group of pediatricians and fellows, previous training on ethics was the only factor that correlated with the higher TREK-P scores (P < .05). Conclusions. The higher scores in fellows support the effectiveness of postgraduate Fogarty/NIH training programs in research ethics.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Tekleab, Atnafu Mekonnen;Lantos, John D.
通讯作者：
Lantos, John D.