Vision and touch: a reconsideration of conflict between the two senses.

Vision and touch: a reconsideration of conflict between the two senses.
复制标题

视觉与触觉:两种感官之间冲突的重新思考。

DOI:
10.1037/h0082425
复制
发表时间:
1972
期刊:
Canadian journal of psychology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Duffett
J. Duffett
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Mcdonnell;J. Duffett

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管许多研究支持 I. Rock 和 J. Victor(参见记录 1964-07119-001)的结论,即视觉-触觉冲突将得到有利于视力的解决,但目前对 30 名本科生进行的研究提供的证据表明,方法论问题可能产生了有利于视力的偏见。一个实验组从视觉和触觉上检查了几种尺寸的木块,而两个对照组则仅通过视觉或触觉检查了木块。在暴露每个块之后,Ss从一组15个块中选择一个大小相等的比较块。群体均值表明实验 Ss 做出的判断是他们的视觉印象和触觉印象之间的折衷。更仔细的检查表明,Ss 的判断要么符合他们的视觉印象,要么符合触觉印象,而且反应模式存在很大的异质性。结果表明,将视觉普遍化为主导形式可能还为时过早。(法国摘要)(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)
Although many studies have supported I. Rock and J. Victor's (see record 1964-07119-001) conclusion that visual-tactual conflicts will be resolved in favor of vision, the present study with 30 undergraduates presents evidence that methodological problems may have produced a bias in favor of vision. An experimental group examined blocks of wood of several sizes both visually and tactually, while 2 control groups examined the blocks by either vision or touch alone. After exposure to each block, Ss selected a comparison block of equal size from a set of 15 blocks. Group means indicate that experimental Ss made a judgment which was a compromise between their visual and tactual impressions. Closer examination showed that Ss made their judgments conform to either their visual or tactual impressions, and that there was great heterogeneity of response pattern. Results indicate that the generalization of vision as a dominant modality may be premature.(French summary)(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)