How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation
How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Murphy, Sheila T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walter, Nathan;Murphy, Sheila T.
该研究报告了试图纠正错误信息的荟萃分析（k=65）。结果表明，纠正信息有一个温和的影响，相信错误信息（r=.35），但是，它是更难纠正错误信息的背景下，政治（r=.15）和营销（r=.18）比健康（r=.27）。纠正真实世界的错误信息更具挑战性（r= 0.14），而不是构建的错误信息（r= 0.48）。反驳（r= 0.38）比预先警告（r= 0.16）更有效，诉诸连贯性（r= 0.55）优于事实核查（r= 0.25），诉诸可信性（r= 0.14）。
The study reports on a meta-analysis of attempts to correct misinformation (k=65). Results indicate that corrective messages have a moderate influence on belief in misinformation (r=.35); however, it is more difficult to correct for misinformation in the context of politics (r=.15) and marketing (r=.18) than health (r=.27). Correction of real-world misinformation is more challenging (r=.14), as opposed to constructed misinformation (r=.48). Rebuttals (r=.38) are more effective than forewarnings (r=.16), and appeals to coherence (r=.55) outperform fact-checking (r=.25), and appeals to credibility (r=.14).