Effects of individual differences and irrelevant speech on WCST and Stroop test
Effects of individual differences and irrelevant speech on WCST and Stroop test
复制标题
DOI：
10.2117/psysoc.2008.28
复制
发表时间：
2008-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Miyarara, Michiko
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goshiki, Toru;Miyarara, Michiko
本研究考察了威斯康星州卡片分类测验（WCST）和Stroop测验中的不相关言语效应（伊势）以及个体差异（内向/外向和场依存/场独立）的影响。在实验1中，不相关的语音和沉默组进行WCST。与伊势不同，FDI影响了WCST的四个指数（CA、TE、PE [米尔纳]和PE [纳尔逊]），但没有影响WCST DMS指数，这表明维持概念的困难。然而，使用DMS观察到伊势。在实验2中，WCST数据在噪声条件下应用。在实验3中，Stroop测试表明，个体差异影响冲突的数量，不像伊势。一般来说，伊势被理解为与工作记忆的语音回路有关，而个体差异与中央执行系统有关。我们认为，WCST涉及中央执行系统和语音回路，而Stroop测验主要涉及中央执行系统。
This study examines the irrelevant speech effect (ISE) and the effects of individual differences (introversion/extroversion and field dependence/independence: FDI) on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and the Stroop Test. In Experiment 1, irrelevant speech and silence groups performed the WCST. Unlike the ISE, FDI affected four WCST indexes (CA, TE, PE [Milner], and PE [Nelson]) but did not affect the WCST DMS index, which shows the difficulty of maintaining concepts. However, the ISE was observed with the DMS. In Experiment 2, WCST data were applied under a noise condition. In Experiment 3, the Stroop Test revealed that individual differences affect the amount of conflict, unlike the ISE. In general, the ISE is understood to relate to the phonological loop of the working memory, with individual differences related to the central executive system. We believe that the WCST involves the central executive system and phonological loop, while the Stroop Test primarily involves the central executive system.