Post-conditionality politics and administrative reform: Reflections on the cases of Uganda and Tanzania
Post-conditionality politics and administrative reform: Reflections on the cases of Uganda and Tanzania
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-7660.00221
复制
发表时间：
2001-09-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Harrison, G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Harrison, G
本文有助于讨论外部干预的性质在债务国的改革进程。从乌干达和坦桑尼亚的行政改革来看，有人认为，撒哈拉以南非洲的外部参与正变得日益分化。对于某些国家-包括这里讨论的两个案例-一组关键的连续性和变化使我们能够概念化一种后条件性制度。在极端的外部依赖和经济增长产生一系列政治动态的情况下，存在着后条件制度，在这些政治动态中，外部与国家的区别变得不那么有用，出现了一系列不平等的相互依赖，捐助者/债权人对改革的参与在质量上变得更加密切，渗透到国家的形式和进程中。在对关键部委和捐助者/债权人的关键干预措施的分析中提供了这一特许的详细情况。最后，文章分析了后条件性制度的矛盾，并展望了其发展前景。
This article contributes to the discussion of the nature of external intervention in the reform processes of indebted states. Looking at administrative reform in Uganda and Tanzania, it is argued that external involvement in sub-Saharan Africa is becoming increasingly differentiated. For some states-including the two cases dealt with here - a key set of continuities and changes allows us to conceptualize a regime of post-conditionality. Post-conditionality regimes exist where extreme external dependence and economic growth produce a set of political dynamics in which external-national distinctions become less useful, in which there emerge a set of unequal mutual dependencies, and in which donor/creditor involvement in reform becomes qualitatively more intimate, pervading the form and processes of the state. Details of this dispensation are provided in an analysis of key ministries and key interventions by donors/creditors. The article finishes by considering the contradictions of the post-conditionality regime, and its prospects.