Ethics, education policy and research: the phonics question reconsidered
Ethics, education policy and research: the phonics question reconsidered
复制标题
伦理、教育政策和研究:重新考虑自然拼读问题
DOI:
10.1002/berj.3039
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Ellis S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ellis S
This paper argues that direct control of the early years literacy curriculum recently exercised by politicians in England has made the boundaries between research, policy and practice increasingly fragile. It describes how policy came to focus most effort on the use of synthetic phonics programmes in the early years. It examines why the Clackmannanshire phonics intervention became the study most frequently cited to justify government policy and suggests a phonics research agenda that could more usefully inform teaching. It argues that, whilst academics cannot control how their research is eventually used by policy‐makers, learned societies can strengthen their ethics policies to set out clearer ground rules for academic researchers working across knowledge domains and with policy‐makers. A stronger framework to guide the ethical interpretation of research evidence in complex education investigations would allow more meaningful conversations to take place within and across research communities, and with research users. The paper suggests some features for such a framework.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Arizona
通讯作者:
A. Arizona
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
C. Connor;F. Morrison;Phyllis S. Underwood
通讯作者:
Phyllis S. Underwood
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Carolyn D. Herrington
通讯作者:
Carolyn D. Herrington
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
G. Thompson;M. McKay;C. Fletcher;V. Connelly;Richard T. Kaa;Jason Ewing
通讯作者:
Jason Ewing
DOI:
10.4324/9780203803301
发表时间:
2012-03
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Ball
通讯作者:
S. Ball