Media Representations of Separated Child Migrants

Media Representations of Separated Child Migrants
复制标题

失散儿童移民的媒体报道

DOI:
10.3167/arms.2018.010107
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Crafter
S. Crafter
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Rosen;S. Crafter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文分析了三个英国分离儿童移民的报道, 《杜布斯修正案》的出台,承诺重新安置 无人陪伴的未成年人到英国,以及拆除非官方难民 在加莱露营。这个营地一直是欧洲“移民危机”的关键象征, 媒体高度关注的话题,其中无人陪伴的儿童占据了突出地位。 通过考虑这一时期小报报道的变化,本文 强调了失散儿童的真实性日益受到重视, 开始以Dubs的名义抵达英国,与此同时, 移民儿童是无辜和脆弱的。我们认为,对邻近性的关注有助于 解释不断变化的话语,媒体可以同时维持矛盾的 通过保留对“儿童”的本质化观点,基于种族化, 欧洲中心主义和先进的资本主义规范。总之,这些观点提出了以下问题: 以“孩子”的名义构建款待的政治后果。
This article analyzes coverage of separated child migrants in three British tabloids between the introduction of the Dubs Amendment, which committed to relocating unaccompanied minors to the UK, and the demolition of the unofficial refugee camp in Calais. This camp has been a key symbol of Europe’s “migration crisis” and the subject of significant media attention in which unaccompanied children feature prominently. By considering the changes in tabloid coverage over this time period, this article highlights the increasing contestation of the authenticity of separated children as they began arriving in the UK under Dubs, concurrent with representations of “genuine” child migrants as innocent and vulnerable. We argue that attention to proximity can help account for changing discourses and that the media can simultaneously sustain contradictory views by preserving an essentialized view of “the child,” grounded in racialized, Eurocentric, and advanced capitalist norms. Together, these points raise questions about the political consequences of framing hospitality in the name of “the child.”