Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis
Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Rothstein, Hannah R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richardson, Katherine M.;Rothstein, Hannah R.
进行了荟萃分析，以确定在职业环境中的压力管理干预措施的有效性。包括36项实验研究，代表55项干预措施。总样本量为2，847。在参与者中，59%为女性，平均年龄为35.4岁，平均干预时间为7.4周。所有研究的总体加权效应量（Cohen's d）为0.526（95%置信区间= 0.364，0.687），为显著的中等至大效应。干预被编码为认知行为，放松，组织，多模式，或替代。基于这些亚组的分析表明，干预类型发挥了调节作用。认知行为方案始终比其他类型的干预措施产生更大的影响，但如果添加额外的治疗成分，效果就会降低。在研究样本中，放松干预最常用，组织干预仍然很少。影响主要基于心理结果变量，而不是生理或组织措施。对其他调节因素（如治疗时间、结局变量和职业）的检查未发现干预类型的效应量存在显著差异。
A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of stress management interventions in occupational settings. Thirty-six experimental studies were included, representing 55 interventions. Total sample size was 2,847. Of the participants, 59% were female, mean age was 35.4, and average length of intervention was 7.4 weeks. The overall weighted effect size (Cohen's d) for all studies was 0.526 (95% confidence interval = 0.364, 0.687), a significant medium to large effect. Interventions were coded as cognitive-behavioral, relaxation, organizational, multimodal, or alternative. Analyses based on these subgroups suggested that intervention type played a moderating role. Cognitive-behavioral programs consistently produced larger effects than other types of interventions, but if additional treatment components were added the effect was reduced. Within the sample of studies, relaxation interventions were most frequently used, and organizational interventions continued to be scarce. Effects were based mainly on psychological outcome variables, as opposed to physiological or organizational measures. The examination of additional moderators such as treatment length, outcome variable, and occupation did not reveal significant variations in effect size by intervention type.