The sustainability of knowledge brokerage of the mental health improvement outcomes framework in Scotland: a follow-up analysis
The sustainability of knowledge brokerage of the mental health improvement outcomes framework in Scotland: a follow-up analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1332/174426418x15193815997735
复制
发表时间：
2020-02-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Windsor, Shirley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Connolly, John;Reid, Garth;Windsor, Shirley
这是Reid et al（2017）的后续研究，该研究考虑了使用知识经纪方法时将知识纳入政策的障碍和促进因素。先前的研究分析了使用结果框架的策略，以减少障碍，在苏格兰的心理健康战略规划中使用证据。主要主持人强调了地方倡导者、伙伴关系网络内的合作以及国家一级支持的重要性。这些障碍是当地的执行文化、当地的时间压力、框架的复杂性以及框架的及时性。本文详细介绍了与当地规划者的心理健康改善成果框架的可持续性的后续定性评价的结果。缺乏关注成果框架可持续性的文献，本研究的结果表明，Reid et al（2017）强调的障碍仍然是严重的问题。然而，在国家和地方关系以及与网络治理和政策改革议程有关的更广泛的挑战和机遇方面，知识经纪人本身还有更多的学习方面。
This is a follow-up study to Reid et al (2017) which considered the barriers and facilitators of getting knowledge into policy when using a knowledge brokering approach. The previous study analysed the use of strategies to reduce barriers to the use of evidence in mental health strategy planning in Scotland using outcome frameworks. The main facilitators highlighted were the importance of local champions, cooperation within partnership networks, and national-level support. The barriers were local implementation cultures, local time pressures, perceived complexities of the framework, and timeliness of the framework. The present article details the results of a follow-up qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of the mental health improvement outcomes framework with local planners. There is a dearth of literature which focuses on the sustainability of outcome frameworks and the findings of this study suggest that the barriers highlighted by Reid et al (2017) remain acute issues. However, there are further aspects for learning for knowledge brokers themselves in terms of national and local relations and the wider challenges and opportunities relating to network governance and policy reform agendas.