Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges
Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges
复制标题
对有学习、沟通和其他障碍的人进行定性研究：方法论挑战
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Nind
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Nind
这篇方法论论文回顾了研究文献，并讨论了在进行定性研究时出现的问题，对这些人来说，传统的定性研究方法可能会给研究人员带来挑战。重点是有学习困难、沟通困难或其他残疾的儿童和成人，如在沟通、理解和参与定性研究方面面临相关复杂挑战的自闭症。该文件的结构遵循进行研究的各个阶段，包括设计、伦理、数据收集、分析和报告。研究其他群体（包括其他所谓的弱势群体，少数群体和难以接触的群体以及主流参与者）的共同方法挑战和与此残疾人群体的研究所特有的挑战都得到了解决，最终为研究人员提供了方法，方法和关键问题的指导。经常性主题包括：向参与者传达抽象思想的技术，使参与者能够表达自己的观点和讲述自己的经历，负责任的行为方式和包容性的行为方式。该审查阐明了一些发展，可以在研究中实现与学习和沟通困难的人和一些限制，在什么已经管理到目前为止。该审查是由NCRM于2008年委托进行的。
This methodological paper reviews the research literature and discusses the issues that arise in conducting qualitative research with people for whom traditional methods of qualitative research might present challenges for researchers. The focus is on children and adults with learning difficulties, communication difficulties or other disabilities such as autism with associated complex challenges in communicating, understanding and taking part in qualitative research. The paper’s structure follows the stages of conducting research and includes design, ethics, data collection, analysis and reporting. Both methodological challenges in common with researching other groups (including other so-called vulnerable groups, minority groups and hard to reach groups as well as mainstream participants) and those unique to research with this disabled group are addressed, culminating in guidance for researchers on methods, approaches and key issues. Recurrent themes include: techniques for communicating abstract ideas to participants, enabling participants to express their views and tell of their experiences, ways of acting responsibly and ways of acting inclusively. The review illuminates some of developments in what can be achieved in research with people with learning and communication difficulties and some of limitations in what has been managed to date. The review was commissioned by NCRM in 2008.