Facilitators and barriers to real-life mobility in community-dwelling older adults: a narrative review of accelerometry- and global positioning system-based studies.
Facilitators and barriers to real-life mobility in community-dwelling older adults: a narrative review of accelerometry- and global positioning system-based studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s40520-022-02096-x
复制
发表时间：
2022-08
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Sejdić E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Suri A;VanSwearingen J;Dunlap P;Redfern MS;Rosso AL;Sejdić E
现实生活中的流动性，也被称为“制定的”流动性，是个人在社区中的活动和参与的特征。现实生活中的行动能力可能受到多种因素的促进或阻碍，例如身体能力、认知功能、心理社会方面和外部环境特征。技术的进步使得使用可穿戴传感器，特别是加速度测量和全球定位系统(GPS)来客观量化现实生活中的移动性成为可能。在这篇综述文章中，首先，我们总结了从加速度计和GPS中提取的常见的移动性度量。其次，我们总结了通过传感器技术评估影响社区老年人行动能力的促进者和障碍之间的关联的研究。我们发现，最常用的加速度量学测量方法关注的是日常生活中活动的持续时间和强度。步态质量指标，例如节奏、可变性和对称性，通常不包括在内。GPS已经被用来研究移动行为，例如所走路径的空间和时间测量，所经过的位置节点，以及交通方式。促进/阻碍社区流动的值得注意的因素是认知和心理社会影响。较少的研究包括外部环境的影响，如人行道质量和社会经济地位，以定义制定的机动性。增加我们对制定行动的促进者和障碍的了解，可以为旨在延迟与行动相关的残疾和改善老年人参与社区的可穿戴技术支持的干预措施提供信息。网上版载有补充材料，可在10.1007/s40520-022-02096-x查阅。
Real-life mobility, also called “enacted” mobility, characterizes an individual’s activity and participation in the community. Real-life mobility may be facilitated or hindered by a variety of factors, such as physical abilities, cognitive function, psychosocial aspects, and external environment characteristics. Advances in technology have allowed for objective quantification of real-life mobility using wearable sensors, specifically, accelerometry and global positioning systems (GPSs). In this review article, first, we summarize the common mobility measures extracted from accelerometry and GPS. Second, we summarize studies assessing the associations of facilitators and barriers influencing mobility of community-dwelling older adults with mobility measures from sensor technology. We found the most used accelerometry measures focus on the duration and intensity of activity in daily life. Gait quality measures, e.g., cadence, variability, and symmetry, are not usually included. GPS has been used to investigate mobility behavior, such as spatial and temporal measures of path traveled, location nodes traversed, and mode of transportation. Factors of note that facilitate/hinder community mobility were cognition and psychosocial influences. Fewer studies have included the influence of external environments, such as sidewalk quality, and socio-economic status in defining enacted mobility. Increasing our understanding of the facilitators and barriers to enacted mobility can inform wearable technology-enabled interventions targeted at delaying mobility-related disability and improving participation of older adults in the community. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-022-02096-x.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Franke, Thea;Winters, Meghan;Sims-Gould, Joanie
通讯作者：
Sims-Gould, Joanie
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
de Guzman, Allan B.;Lagdaan, Lovely France M.;Lagoy, Marie Lauren V.
通讯作者：
Lagoy, Marie Lauren V.
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Glass, TA
通讯作者：
Glass, TA
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Giannouli, Eleftheria;Bock, Otmar;Zijlstra, Wiebren
通讯作者：
Zijlstra, Wiebren
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Hanke, Timothy A.;Hwang, Sungsoon;Evans, Christian C.
通讯作者：
Evans, Christian C.