Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Reduced (COHIP-SF 19)
Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Reduced (COHIP-SF 19)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00338.x
复制
发表时间：
2012-09-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Sischo, Lacey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Broder, Hillary L.;Wilson-Genderson, Maureen;Sischo, Lacey
目的：本研究评估的可靠性和有效性的儿童口腔健康影响简表19（COHIP-SF 19）从验证的34项COHIP.Methods：参与者包括205名儿童，107正畸，和863例颅面畸形（CFAs）。项目级评估包括检查内容重叠，分布特性，并使用的响应集。验证性因素分析确定了潜在的删除项目。量表信度采用Cronbach’s alpha进行评估。COHIP-SF 19的判别效度评估如下：在儿童参与者中，将得分与恒牙上不同数量的龋蚀和填充表面（DFS）和龋齿的存在进行比较;对于正畸患者，得分与前牙间距/拥挤相关;对于CFA患者，将评分与临床医生对鼻和唇缺损程度（EOD）和/或言语鼻音过强的评分进行比较。通过检查COHIP评分和标准全球健康自我评定之间的部分斯皮尔曼相关性来评估收敛效度。COHIP和COHIP-SF 19之间的比较是在整个samples.Results：简化的问卷包括19个项目：口腔健康（5个项目），功能幸福感（4个项目），和一个组合的分量表命名为社会情感幸福感（10个项目）。三个样本的内部可靠性=0.82。结果表明，COHIP-SF 19通过EOD和基于社区的儿科样本在治疗组内和治疗组间进行区分。该措施与全球健康评级（P < 0.05），从而表明收敛validity.Conclusions：可靠性和有效性测试表明，COHIP-SF 19是一种心理测量健全的工具，以衡量口腔健康相关的生活质量在学龄儿童人群。
Objectives: This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Child Oral Health Impact ProfileShort Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) from the validated 34-item COHIP.Methods: Participants included 205 pediatric, 107 orthodontic, and 863 patients with craniofacial anomalies (CFAs). Item level evaluations included examining content overlap, distributional properties, and use of the response set. Confirmatory factor analysis identified potential items for deletion. Scale reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Discriminant validity of the COHIP-SF 19 was evaluated as follows: among pediatric participants, scores were compared with varying amounts of decayed and filled surfaces (DFS) and presence of caries on permanent teeth; for orthodontic patients, scores were correlated with anterior tooth spacing/crowding; and for those with CFA, scores were compared with clinicians' ratings of extent of defect (EOD) for nose and lip and/or speech hypernasality. Convergent validity was assessed by examining the partial Spearman correlation between the COHIP scores and a standard Global Health self-rating. Comparisons between the COHIP and the COHIP-SF 19 were completed across samples.Results: The reduced questionnaire consists of 19 items: Oral Health (five items), Functional Well-Being (four items), and a combined subscale named Socio-Emotional Well-Being (10 items). Internal reliability is =0.82 for the three samples. Results demonstrate that the COHIP-SF 19 discriminates within and across treatment groups by EOD and within a community-based pediatric sample. The measure is associated with the Global Health rating (P < 0.05), thereby indicating convergent validity.Conclusions: Reliability and validity testing demonstrate that the COHIP-SF 19 is a psychometrically sound instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life across school-aged pediatric populations.