Intraoral air pressure and oral air flow under different bleed and bite-block conditions.

Intraoral air pressure and oral air flow under different bleed and bite-block conditions.
复制标题

不同出血和咬合条件下的口腔内气压和口腔气流。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Kastner
C. Kastner
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. H. Putnam;R. Shelton;C. Kastner

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

口内压力和口腔流量进行了测量,作为正常的谈话者生产/p lambda/和/si/在实验条件下,扰乱了通常的空气动力学生产特性的辅音。在/p/期间使用经唇压力释放装置来释放口内压力。在/s/期间使用咬合块人工打开前牙咬合。对于/p/,口内压降低,经唇漏气量随着出血口面积的增加而增加。对于/s/,流量增加的嘶嘶声收缩面积的增加,但跨/s/口收缩的压差并没有系统地改变其面积的变化。在实验条件下,辅音后元音/lambda/和/i/的流动没有系统性的变化。这些数据意味着,维持扰动口内压是更有效的补偿选项时,包括增加呼吸驱动和结构调整的地方,辅音发音,而不是增加呼吸驱动单独的机会。
Intraoral pressures and oral flows were measured as normal talkers produced /p lambda/ and /si/ under experimental conditions that perturbed the usual aeromechanical production characteristics of the consonants. A translabial pressure-release device was used to bleed off intraoral pressure during /p/. Bite-blocks were used to open the anterior bite artificially during /s/. For /p/, intraoral pressure decreased and translabial air leakage increased as bleed orifice area increased. For /s/, flow increased as the area of sibilant constriction increased, but differential pressure across the /s/ oral constriction did not vary systematically with changes in its area. Flow on postconsonantal vowels /lambda/ and /i/ did not vary systematically across experimental conditions. The data imply that maintenance of perturbed intraoral pressure was more effective when compensatory options included opportunity for increased respiratory drive and structural adjustments at the place of consonant articulation rather than increased respiratory drive alone.