Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project, part II: provider knowledge.

Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project, part II: provider knowledge.
复制标题

苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理项目,第二部分:提供者知识。

DOI:
10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.x
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
Cancer practice.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jensen,PB
Jensen,PB
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elliott,TE;Elliott,BA;Regal,RR;Renier,CM;Crouse,BJ;Gangeness,DE;Witrak,MT;Jensen,PB

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

目的:本文的目的是报告苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理项目的主要学习成果。研究描述:作者设计并测试了一项针对美国中北部大农村地区的农村提供者及其医疗保健系统的多模式干预措施。采用实验设计在群体层面对农村提供者进行随机分组。干预措施包括通过多种方法为农村提供者提供更多的教育,包括使用临床意见领袖。干预的主要结果是特定学科癌症管理测试的知识评分。结果:实验组提供者的知识评分从前测到后测显着增加:医师(和医师助理)为 66 至 79(P= .02);护士为 58 至 71 (P= .01);药剂师为 54 至 64 (P= .01)。在后测试中,参与实验组的提供者在知识测试中的表现明显优于对照组(P < .01)。 临床意义:本研究可能是第一个使用实验设计来测试教育干预措施以提高农村提供者对癌症实践的知识的研究。干预措施可能会改变提供者的实践行为,从而改变患者的治疗结果以及将在未来一期中报告的数据。最后,这种教育干预可能对其他农村地区的提供者有用。
Purpose:The purpose of this article is to report the main learning outcomes of the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.Description of Study:The authors designed and tested a multimodal intervention directed at rural providers and their healthcare systems in a large rural area in the north central United States. An experimental design was used to randomize rural providers at the group level. The intervention consisted of providing increased education for rural providers with a number of approaches, including the use of clinical opinion leaders. The main outcome of the intervention was knowledge scoring on discipline‐specific cancer management tests.Results:Knowledge scores for providers in the experimental group significantly increased from pretest to post‐test: 66 to 79 for physicians (and physician assistants) (P= .02); 58 to 71 for nurses (P= .01); and 54 to 64 for pharmacists (P= .01). At post‐test, participating providers in the experimental group performed significantly better on the knowledge tests (P< .01) than those in the control groups.Clinical Implications:This study may be the first to test educational interventions to improve rural providers' knowledge about cancer practice using an experimental design. The intervention may possibly change provider practice behaviors and, thus, patient outcomes, data that will be reported in a future issue. Finally, this educational intervention may prove useful for providers in other rural areas.
苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理项目,第一部分:介入试验。
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.91006.x
发表时间: 2001
期刊: Cancer practice.
影响因子: --
作者:
Elliott,TE;Elliott,BA;Regal,RR;Renier,CM;Crouse,BJ;Gangeness,DE;Witrak,MT;Jensen,PB
通讯作者: Jensen,PB
执业内科医生的知识库随着时间的推移而变化。
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199202000-00034
发表时间: 1991
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Ramsey;J. Carline;T. Inui;E. Larson;J. LoGerfo;J. Norcini;M. Wenrich
通讯作者: M. Wenrich
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530090032018
发表时间: 1995
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Davis;M. Thomson;A. Oxman;R. Haynes
通讯作者: R. Haynes
实施临床实践指南:社会影响策略和从业者行为改变。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1992
期刊: QRB - Quality Review Bulletin
影响因子: --
作者:
B. Mittman;X. Tonesk;P. Jacobson
通讯作者: P. Jacobson
弥合研究与实践之间的差距:继续医学教育的作用
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540260069039
发表时间: 1997
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
W. C. Felch
通讯作者: W. C. Felch