Role of residue 161 in the allosteric transitions of two bacterial phosphofructokinases.
Role of residue 161 in the allosteric transitions of two bacterial phosphofructokinases.
复制标题
残基 161 在两种细菌磷酸果糖激酶变构转变中的作用。
DOI:
10.1021/bi00021a018
复制
发表时间:
1995
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Chang,SH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Auzat,I;Byrnes,WM;Garel,JR;Chang,SH
Revised Manuscript Received March 20, 1995s abstract: The loop between a-helix 6 and/3-strand F of the phosphofructokinase (PFK) from Bacillus stearothermophilus is proposedto be important in the allosteric transition of the enzyme [Schirmer, T., & Evans, P. R.(1990) Nature 343,140—145], Except for residue 161, the amino acids within the loop are similar between B. stearothermophilus PFK (BsPFK) and the PFK from Escherichia coli (EcPFK). In the former enzyme, residue 161 is a glutamate, while in the latter it is a glutamine. We haveused site-directed mutagenesisto investigate the importance of residue 161 for the allosteric regulation of the two enzymes by phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), an inhibitor, and GDP, an activator. In BsPFK, glutamate 161 has been changed to a glutamine and an alanine, while in EcPFK, glutamine 161 has been changed to a glutamate, an arginine, and an alanine. The kinetic parameters of the mutant enzymes were similar to those of the respective wild types, indicating thatresidue 161 is not directly involved in substrate binding and catalysis. One of the EcPFK mutants, Q161A, though activatednormally by GDP, was completely insensitive toPEP. This indicates thatthe hydrogen-bonding abilityof residue 161 is critical for PEP inhibition of EcPFK and suggests that GDP activation and PEP inhibition follow different structural pathways in EcPFK. The BsPFK mutant enzymes were less sensitive to PEP inhibition and more sensitive to GDP activation, suggesting that inhibition and activation are opposed and follow a common structural pathway in agreement with a concerted allosteric mechanism.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
M. Serre;W. Teschner;J. Garel
通讯作者:
J. Garel
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
BYRNES, M;ZHU, XM;CHANG, SH
通讯作者:
CHANG, SH
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
G. Le Bras;J. Garel
通讯作者:
J. Garel
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
POORMAN, RA;RANDOLPH, A;HEINRIKSON, RL
通讯作者:
HEINRIKSON, RL
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
F. Lau;A. Fersht
通讯作者:
A. Fersht