Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings.
Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings.
复制标题
测量误差掩盖了情感评级中的双极性。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1029
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Salovey,P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Green,DP;Goldman,SL;Salovey,P
多年来，情感研究人员一直在争论情绪的真实维度。一些人认为，积极和消极的情绪在很大程度上是独立的，可以同时体验。其他人声称情绪是两极的，喜悦和悲伤代表着单一维度的两端。本文提供的三项研究表明，据称表明似乎相反的情绪状态的独立性，即积极和消极情绪之间的低相关性的证据，可能是由于随机和非随机反应错误而未能考虑到偏见的结果。当使用多种情绪评估方法将这些误差来源考虑在内时，就会出现一种主要的情感两极结构。这里的数据说明了多方法方法测量情绪的重要性。(《心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA》，版权所有)
For years, affect researchers have debated about the true dimensionality of mood. Some have argued that positive and negative moods are largely independent and can be experienced simultaneously. Others claim that mood is bipolar, that joy and sorrow represent opposite ends of a single dimension. The 3 studies presented in this article suggest that the evidence that purportedly shows the independence of seemingly opposite mood states, that is, low correlations between positive and negative moods, may be the result of failures to consider biases due to random and nonrandom response error. When these sources of error are taken into account using multiple methods of mood assessment, a largely bipolar structure for affect emerges. The data herein speak to the importance of a multimethod approach to the measurement of mood.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)