Political Tolerance In Context: Support For Unpopular Minorities In Israel, New Zealand And The United States
Political Tolerance In Context: Support For Unpopular Minorities In Israel, New Zealand And The United States
复制标题
背景下的政治宽容:对以色列、新西兰和美国不受欢迎的少数群体的支持
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1985
影响因子:
6.8
通讯作者:
Denns Chong
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Denns Chong
chapter presents a rigorous analysis of Soviet economic stagnation and examines the plans and prospects for reform. There are a number of very informative tables and charts pertaining to the growth of the Soviet economy and to trade between the Soviet Union and the outside world. Each chapter has a very up-to-date bibliography to the end of 1983. Five chapters deal with political and military matters. Of especially high quality are Thane Gustafson's "The Andropov Accession," Steven Rosefielde's "Soviet Arms Buildup or US Arms Decline?," Dimitri K. Simes's "Can the West Affect Soviet Thinking?," Wolfgang Leonhard's "Soviet Foreign Policy: Interests, Motives and Objectives," and Fritz W. Ermath's "The United States and the Soviet Strategic Challenge." The final two chapters are really a brief essay by Richard Pipes, "US Policy Opportunities," and a short speech by Lawrence Eagleburger, "US National Interests and the Soviet Union." This book constitutes a periodic check up of the body politic of Soviet totalitarianism by a highly specialized team of experts at a time of internal erosion and external expansion in the USSR. It should be of particular interest to policy makers in Washington, for whom this work was primarily intended. The authors of the chapters were commissioned in 1982 by the United States Information Agency, the Georgetown University Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies in Washington, D.C. to present papers, which were exposed to vigorous discussion during a series of four one-day conferences held in 1983. Subsequently, the authors revised their papers, which appear in this book in their final form. This whole process was initiated by the policy makers in Washington, who were eager to benefit from experts in the field of Soviet studies. It is very encouraging that government officials and policy makers are anxious to cooperate on an intellectual level with outstanding scholars. This work is of such quality that it will also be useful to academicians at large who want to keep up with the latest developments in the Soviet Union.