One versus many: Capturing the use of multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to an emotion-eliciting stimulus

One versus many: Capturing the use of multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to an emotion-eliciting stimulus
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02699931.2012.739998
复制
发表时间:
2013-06-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aldao, Amelia;Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在过去的15年里,人们对情感过程的研究重新燃起了兴趣。James Gross的情绪调节过程模型为这种方法提供了理论框架。这个模型规定,个人有一个剧目的情绪调节策略,他们使用,以修改他们的影响和/或引起这种影响的情况。然而,使用情绪调节策略的实证研究在很大程度上简化了这个模型,假设个人只使用一种调节策略来管理由给定的情绪引发的刺激或情况引起的影响。这是有问题的,因为它导致对个人选择和实施监管策略的复杂过程的理解有限。在这份简短的报告中,我们提出的研究结果表明,人们自发地使用多种情绪调节策略,以应对一个简短的引起厌恶的电影剪辑。我们讨论了未来的情绪调节策略的实证工作的影响。
The past decade and a half has witnessed a renewed interest in the study of affective processes. James Gross' process model of emotion regulation has provided a theoretical framework for this approach. This model stipulates that individuals have a repertoire of emotion regulation strategies they use in order to modify their affect and/or the situations eliciting such affect. However, empirical investigations of the use of emotion regulation strategies have largely oversimplified this model by assuming that individuals use only one regulation strategy to manage the affect elicited by a given emotion-eliciting stimulus or situation. This is problematic because it has resulted in a limited understanding of the complex process by which individuals select and implement regulation strategies. In this brief report, we present findings suggesting that people spontaneously use multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to a brief disgust-eliciting film clip. We discuss implications for future empirical work on emotion regulation strategies.