Defining translational research: implications for training.
Defining translational research: implications for training.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ccd618
复制
发表时间：
2010-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Esposito K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rubio DM;Schoenbaum EE;Lee LS;Schteingart DE;Marantz PR;Anderson KE;Platt LD;Baez A;Esposito K
由于翻译研究没有明确的定义，翻译研究计划的开发人员正在努力阐明具体的计划目标，描述受训者期望发展的知识和技能（能力），创建适当的课程，并跟踪结果以评估是否符合计划目标和能力要求。临床研究培训协会（ACRT）评估委员会的成员审查了转化研究的当前定义，并提出了一个可操作的定义，用于教育框架。转化研究促进了基础研究、面向患者的研究和基于人群的研究的多方向和多学科的整合，其长期目标是改善公众的健康。作者认为，设计和评估翻译培训项目成功的方法必须足够灵活，以适应各个机构和机构内个别学员的需求，但它也必须足够严格，以证明该计划符合其短期，中期和长期目标，其学员符合预先设定的能力要求。本文提出了一个翻译研究项目评估的逻辑模型。
Because translational research is not clearly defined, developers of translational research programs are struggling to articulate specific program objectives, delineate the knowledge and skills (competencies) that trainees are expected to develop, create an appropriate curriculum, and track outcomes to assess whether program objectives and competency requirements are being met. Members of the Evaluation Committee of the Association for Clinical Research Training (ACRT) reviewed current definitions of translational research and proposed an operational definition to use in the educational framework. In this article, the authors posit that translational research fosters the multidirectional and multidisciplinary integration of basic research, patient-oriented research, and population-based research, with the long-term aim of improving the health of the public. The authors argue that the approach to designing and evaluating the success of translational training programs must therefore be flexible enough to accommodate the needs of individual institutions and individual trainees within the institutions but that it must also be rigorous enough to document that the program is meeting its short-, intermediate-, and long-term objectives and that its trainees are meeting preestablished competency requirements. A logic model is proposed for the evaluation of translational research programs.