Evaluation of the Clinical and Microbiological Response to Salmonella Paratyphi A Infection in the First Paratyphoid Human Challenge Model
Evaluation of the Clinical and Microbiological Response to Salmonella Paratyphi A Infection in the First Paratyphoid Human Challenge Model
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/cid/cix042
复制
发表时间:
2017-04-15
影响因子:
11.8
通讯作者:
Pollard, Andrew J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dobinson, Hazel C.;Gibani, Malick M.;Pollard, Andrew J.
Background. To expedite the evaluation of vaccines against paratyphoid fever, we aimed to develop the first human challenge model of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A infection.Methods. Two groups of 20 participants underwent oral challenge with S. Paratyphi A following sodium bicarbonate pretreatment at 1 of 2 dose levels (group 1: 1-5 x 10(3) colony-forming units [CFU] and group 2: 0.5-1 x 10(3) CFU). Participants were monitored in an outpatient setting with daily clinical review and collection of blood and stool cultures. Antibiotic treatment was started when prespecified diagnostic criteria were met (temperature >= 38 degrees C for >= 12 hours and/or bacteremia) or at day 14 postchallenge.Results. The primary study objective was achieved following challenge with 1-5 x 10(3) CFU (group 1), which resulted in an attack rate of 12 of 20 (60%). Compared with typhoid challenge, paratyphoid was notable for high rates of subclinical bacteremia (at this dose, 11/20 [55%]). Despite limited symptoms, bacteremia persisted for up to 96 hours after antibiotic treatment (median duration of bacteremia, 53 hours [interquartile range, 24-85 hours]). Shedding of S. Paratyphi A in stool typically preceded onset of bacteremia.Conclusions. Challenge with S. Paratyphi A at a dose of 1-5 x 10(3) CFU was well tolerated and associated with an acceptable safety profile. The frequency and persistence of bacteremia in the absence of clinical symptoms was notable, and markedly different from that seen in previous typhoid challenge studies. We conclude that the paratyphoid challenge model is suitable for the assessment of vaccine efficacy using endpoints that include bacteremia and/or symptomatology.