Luke's 3rd year: A 35-year retrospective
Luke's 3rd year: A 35-year retrospective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15328015tlm1303_9
复制
发表时间：
2001-06-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Reilly, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blazer, D;Bradford, W;Reilly, C
目的：我们的目的是回顾和评估杜克大学医学院的第三年。摘要：杜克大学医学院在35年前通过重组医学院的第一，第二和第四年，使整个第三年可以专门用于选修研究经验或基础科学的独立学习，在其课程设置的一个巨大的变化。今天，这种“新课程”允许学生在基础科学实验室或临床研究人员工作，获得第二学位，并参加核心课程之外的基础科学课程。1996年和1998年对学生进行了关于他们第三年经历的调查。结果显示，分别有67%和73%的受访者认为第三年对促进他们对生物医学和临床研究的理解和欣赏非常有帮助。学生特别重视他们的导师的经验和可用性以及第三年的机会范围。学生最常见的批评是缺乏追求临床兴趣的机会，难以将第三年融入课程的其余部分，以及过于强调将第三年的经验与奖学金和住院医师计划相结合，而不是强调具体的调查兴趣的倾向。总体而言，教师和学生都重视第三年作为一个独特的积极的经验。然而，杜克大学的教师们指出，没有其他医学院试图复制杜克大学的经验。版权所有（C）2001年由劳伦斯Erlbaum联营公司。
Purpose: Our purpose was to review and evaluate Duke University School of Medicine's 3rd year.Summary: Duke University School of Medicine instituted a dramatic change in its curriculum 35 years ago by restructuring the 1st, 2nd, and 4th years of medical school so that the entire 3rd year could be devoted to an elective research experience or independent study of the basic sciences. Today this "new curriculum" permits students to work in basic science laboratories or with clinical investigators, work reward a 2nd degree, and participate in basic science courses beyond the core curriculum. Students were surveyed in 1996 and 1998 about their 3rd-year experience. Results showed that 67% and 73%, respectively, believed the 3rd year was very helpful in facilitating their understanding and appreciation of biomedical and clinical research. Students especially valued the experience and availability of their preceptors and the range of opportunities available during the 3rd year The most frequent critiques by students were the lack of opportunities to pursue clinical interests, difficulty integrating the 3rd year into the remainder of the curriculum, and a tendency to place too much emphasis on coupling the 3rd-year experience with scholarships and residency plans rather than on a specific investigative interestConclusions: Overall, both faculty and students value the 3rd year as a unique positive experience. Duke faculty have noted, however that no other medical schools have attempted to replicate the Duke experience. Copyright (C) 2001 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.