Office-Based Tools and Primary Care Visit Communication, Length, and Preventive Service Delivery
Office-Based Tools and Primary Care Visit Communication, Length, and Preventive Service Delivery
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/1475-6773.12348
复制
发表时间:
2016-04-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Street, Richard L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lafata, Jennifer Elston;Shay, L. Aubree;Street, Richard L.
BackgroundThe use of physician office-based tools such as electronic health records (EHRs), health risk appraisal (HRA) instruments, and written patient reminder lists is encouraged to support efficient, high-quality, patient-centered care. We evaluate the association of exam room use of EHRs, HRA instruments, and self-generated written patient reminder lists with patient-physician communication behaviors, recommended preventive health service delivery, and visit length.Research MethodsObservational study of 485 office visits with 64 primary care physicians practicing in a health system serving the Detroit metropolitan area. Study data were obtained from patient surveys, direct observation, office visit audio-recordings, and automated health system records. Outcome measures included visit length in minutes, patient use of active communication behaviors, physician use of supportive talk and partnership-building communication behaviors, and percentage of delivered guideline-recommended preventive health services for which patients are eligible and due. Simultaneous linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between tool use and outcomes. Adjusted models controlled for patient characteristics, physician characteristics, characteristics of the relationship between the patient and physician, and characteristics of the environment in which the visit took place.ResultsPrior to adjusting for other factors, visits in which the EHR was used on average were significantly (p.05) in adjusted models with the exception of that between HRA use and preventive service delivery.Dissemination and Implementation ImplicationsOffice-based tools intended to facilitate the implementation of desired primary care practice redesign are associated with both positive and negative cost and quality outcomes. Findings highlight the need for monitoring both intended and unintended consequences of office-based tools commonly used in primary care practice redesign.