Dogwhistles, Trust and Ideology

Dogwhistles, Trust and Ideology
复制标题

狗哨、信任和意识形态

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. McCready
E. McCready
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Henderson;E. McCready

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Given that someone is consistently untruthful, why should we ever trust them? The question is not academic. Consider politicians and others who are known to consistently lie, but who are still listened to and voted back into office. This talk addresses this puzzle via three mechanisms: (i) a theory of source evaluation based on interactional histories and heuristics for judgments of reliability (McCready, 2015), (ii) a game-theoretic view of how speaker ideologies and political positions are communicated by linguistic acts (Burnett, 2018; Henderson and McCready, 2018), and (iii) a theory of how ideological considerations are valued alongside truth-conditional content. In the process, an analysis of fake news claims is provided.