Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising
Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising
复制标题
构建布瓦吉吉：2010-11 年突尼斯起义中的“善意谎言”、混合网络和集体/关联行动
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Lim
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Lim
通过深入研究突尼斯起义的详细描述，本文提供了一种解释，将2010年的起义与其前身区分开来。2010年的起义之所以成功，是因为活动人士成功地弥合了地理和阶级差异，并将线下和在线活动融合在一起。这种联系和汇聚是可能的，首先，通过可获得戏剧性的视觉证据，将当地的事件变成了一场奇观。其次，通过成功地将画面与大师叙事相结合，在文化和政治上引起整个人口的共鸣。第三，启动由关联结构组成的混合网络，以促进集体行动--在拥有共同身份和集体框架的突尼斯人之间--和在寻求通过数字媒体为运动做出贡献的更个性化途径的个人之间的联系行动。
By delving into the detailed account of the Tunisian uprising, this article offers an explanation that sets the 2010 uprising apart from its precursors. The 2010 uprising was successful because activists successfully managed to bridge geographical and class divides as well as to converge offline and online activisms. Such connection and convergence were made possible, first, through the availability of dramatic visual evidence that turned a local incident into a spectacle. Second, by successful frame alignment with a master narrative that culturally and politically resonated with the entire population. Third, by activating a hybrid network made of the connective structures to facilitate collective action – among Tunisians who shared collective identities and collective frames – and connective action – among individuals who sought more personalized paths to contribute to the movement through digital media.