Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.

Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.
复制标题

用于分析测量等效性的效应大小指数:了解组间差异的实际重要性。

DOI:
10.1037/a0022955
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
The Journal of applied psychology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
F. Drasgow
F. Drasgow
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christopher D. Nye;F. Drasgow

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

由于不同项目功能(DIF)对组织评估的实际、理论和法律意义,在对不同群体的个人分数进行比较之前,测量等价性研究是必要的第一步。然而,通常推荐的评估这些分析结果的标准有几个重要的限制。本研究提出了用于验证性因素分析(CFA)测量等价性研究的效应大小指数,以解决其中的1个限制。本文以美国英语、希腊语和汉语的人格数据为例说明了该指数的应用。结果显示,这些样本之间存在一定范围的不等价性,这些差异与观察到的DIF对评估结果的影响(即群体水平的平均差异和不良影响)有关。
Because of the practical, theoretical, and legal implications of differential item functioning (DIF) for organizational assessments, studies of measurement equivalence are a necessary first step before scores can be compared across individuals from different groups. However, commonly recommended criteria for evaluating results from these analyses have several important limitations. The present study proposes an effect size index for confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) studies of measurement equivalence to address 1 of these limitations. The application of this index is illustrated with personality data from American English, Greek, and Chinese samples. Results showed a range of nonequivalence across these samples, and these differences were linked to the observed effects of DIF on the outcomes of the assessment (i.e., group-level mean differences and adverse impact).
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.696167
发表时间: 2001-12-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Saucier, G;Goldberg, LR
通讯作者: Goldberg, LR
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
发表时间: 1994-12-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
SAUCIER, G
通讯作者: SAUCIER, G
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.12.4.381
发表时间: 2007-12-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Cole, David A.;Ciesla, Jeffrey A.;Steiger, James H.
通讯作者: Steiger, James H.