Literary Interference between German and Jewish-Hebrew Children's Literature during the Enlightenment: The Case of Campe
Literary Interference between German and Jewish-Hebrew Children's Literature during the Enlightenment: The Case of Campe
复制标题
启蒙时期德国儿童文学与犹太希伯来儿童文学之间的文学干扰：以坎普为例
作者：
Z. Shavit
德国文化在现代犹太人思想和文化发展中所起的决定性作用，到目前为止已经司空见惯，几乎是老生常谈了。标准的研究和许多最近的研究都广泛集中在接触，互动和犹太希伯来语和德国文化之间的交流，特别是从十八世纪起的各个阶段。(To仅举几个例子，参见Breuer 1986; Eisenstein-Barzilay 1955; Eliav 1960; Katz 1935，1973; Kober 1947，1954; Levin 1975; Liberles 1986 a，1986 b; Ozer 1947; Rapel 1986; Reinharz和Schatzberg 1985; Simon 1953; Sorkin 1987; Stern-Taeubler（1940，1950- 1951）。然而，除了最近的几项研究之外，这些关系得以实现和具体化的实际代理人和渠道问题基本上仍未得到解决（见，例如，Bartal 1990; Feiner 1990; Sorkin 1990）。人们对这些文化相互关系中的具体因素和渠道缺乏兴趣，这不能像人们所认为的那样，用这些因素在文化干预过程中所起的边缘作用来解释。事实上，研究证明恰恰相反：对这些媒介缺乏兴趣，而是因为它们在整个文化意识中处于边缘地位。这些特工，他们在一个实践中发挥作用-
The decisive role played by German culture in the development of modern Jewish thought and culture is by now a commonplace-almost a banal one, at that. Standard research and numerous recent studies have focused extensively on the various phases of contact, interaction, and exchange between the Jewish-Hebrew and the German cultures, especially from the eighteenth century onward. (To mention just a few examples, see Breuer 1986; Eisenstein-Barzilay 1955; Eliav 1960; Katz 1935, 1973; Kober 1947, 1954; Levin 1975; Liberles 1986a, 1986b; Ozer 1947; Rapel 1986; Reinharz and Schatzberg 1985; Simon 1953; Sorkin 1987; Stern-Taeubler 1940, 1950-51). However, the question of the actual agents and channels whereby these relations were made possible and materialized has remained largely unaddressed, with the exception of a few recent studies (see, e.g., Bartal 1990; Feiner 1990; Sorkin 1990). This ostensible lack of interest in the concrete agents and channels involved in these cultural interrelations cannot be explained, as might be assumed, in terms of the marginal roles played by these factors in the process of cultural interference. Research proves in fact quite the opposite: Lack of interest in these agents stems, rather, from their marginal positions in the overall cultural consciousness. These agents, who functioned at a prac-