On projective identification.
On projective identification.
复制标题
关于投射性认同。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Ogden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Ogden
精神分析思维的一项持续性任务是试图产生概念和一致的语言，这些概念和语言有助于理解内心领域中的现象（例如思想和感受）与外部现实和人际关系领域中的现象（例如，与该人的心理表征相对的对象关系中的另一个人的现实）之间的相互作用。精神分析理论缺乏概念和语言来帮助弥合这些领域。由于投射认同可以被理解为代表一种这样的桥接表述，因此，这一概念仍然是精神分析概念化中定义最松散、理解最不完整的概念之一，这对精神分析思维是不利的。本文试图采取一些步骤，以更广泛地理解投射识别，以及对这一领域的定义的精度增加。投射认同的概念将与其他相关的精神分析概念，如投射，内射，认同，内化和外化相联系。此外，我们还努力更准确地理解投射认同中幻想的本质和功能，以及幻想成分与外部现实和真实的对象关系的关系，特别是投射幻想（内心现象）如何与真实的、外部对象有关。此外，本文试图更明确地规定投射认同的经验所指。一旦明确了投射性认同的含义，本文将对这一概念进行简要的历史回顾。最后，在理解投射认同的基础上，本文前面提到了投射认同对心理治疗技术和临床理论的影响。这将包括在处理投射识别的问题的来源的检查和解释的作用，在一个治疗互动的特点是投射识别的看法。
It is a continuing task of psychoanalytic thinking to attempt to generate concepts and consistent language that are helpful in understanding the interplay between phenomena in an intrapsychic sphere (e.g. thoughts and feelings) and phenomena in the sphere of external reality and interpersonal relations (e.g. the reality of the other person in an object relationship as opposed to the psychological representation of that person). Psychoanalytic theory suffers from a paucity of concepts and language that help to bridge these areas. Since projective identification can be understood as representing one such bridging formulation, it is to the detriment of psychoanalytic thinking that this concept remains one of the most loosely defined and incompletely understood of psychoanalytic conceptualizations. This paper attempts to make some steps towards a wider understanding of projective identification, as well as towards an increased precision of definition in this area. The concept of projective identification will be located in relation to other related psychoanalytic concepts, such as projection, introjection, identification, internalization, and externalization. In addition, there is an effort to arrive at a more precise understanding of the nature and function of fantasy in projective identification, and the relation of that fantasy component to external reality and to real object relations, specifically how projective fantasies (intrapsychic phenomena) about with real, external objects. Further, the paper attempts to specify more clearly the experiential referents of projective identification. Once what is meant by projective identification has been clarified, a brief historical overview of the concept is offered. Finally, on the basis of the understanding of projective identification arrived at earlier in the paper, there is a discussion of the resulting implications for psychotherapeutic technique and for clinical theory. This will include an examination of sources of problems in the handling of projective identifications and a view of the role of interpretation in a therapeutic interaction characterized by projective identifications.