Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill

Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/jac/dki014
复制
发表时间:
2005-03-01
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Wilson, APR
Wilson, APR
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Whitehouse, T;Cepeda, JA;Wilson, APR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:为了确定利奈唑胺和替考拉宁在危重病Patients.Patients和methods的药代动力学特征:血清经常收集在第0天,然后前和1小时后给药的第1天,第2天,第3天,第5天,第7天,此后每三天在治疗期间。使用HPLC分析血清利奈唑胺浓度。血清替考拉宁水平进行了分析荧光偏振immunoassay.Results:一个二室模型,需要表征利奈唑胺的药代动力学(n=28),并解释多次给药后看到的积累。估计清除率为0.049 +/-0.016 L/h/kg(+/-s.e.m.)。估计)。在稳态(给药间隔12 h)下,600 mg给药后利奈唑胺血清浓度超过4 mg/L的折点持续10.88 h(95% CI 10.09-11.66),AUC/MIC为92.4(95% CI 57.2-127.7)。替考拉宁的最佳描述为二室模型(n=26)。清除率为4.97+/-1.58 L/h。在所有受试者中,整个给药间隔(400 mg剂量,每12小时一次)的血清水平均超过4 mg/L的折点,AUC/MIC为399.3(95% CI 329.6-469.0)。然而,14例中只有4例超过10 mg/L的血清谷浓度。对于这两种药物,谷水平是相似的,在那些谁幸存下来,那些谁dead.Conclusions:利奈唑胺剂量在600毫克,每12小时是足够的,在危重病,而不需要调整肾功能。对于替考拉宁,需要进一步研究以确认谷浓度10 mg/L是否与高于5 mg/L的治愈率相关。如果是这样,则需要进行血清药物测定以确保治疗水平。
Objectives: To determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of linezolid and teicoplanin in critically ill patients.Patients and methods: Serum was collected frequently during day 0 and then pre- and 1 h post-dose on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and every third day thereafter during treatment. Serum linezolid concentrations were analysed using HPLC. Serum teicoplanin levels were analysed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.Results: A two-compartment model was required to characterize linezolid pharmacokinetics (n=28) and account for the accumulation seen after multiple dosing. The estimated clearance was 0.049 +/-0.016 L/h/kg (+/-s.e.m. of estimate). At steady state (dosing interval 12 h), linezolid serum concentrations exceeded the breakpoint of 4 mg/L for 10.88 h (95% CI 10.09-11.66) after a 600 mg dose with an AUC/MIC of 92.4 (95% CI 57.2-127.7). Teicoplanin was best described by a two-compartment model (n=26). The clearance was 4.97+/-1.58 L/h. Serum levels exceeded the breakpoint of 4 mg/L for the entire dosing interval in all subjects (400 mg dose every 12 h) with an AUC/MIC of 399.3 (95% CI 329.6-469.0). However, only four of 14 exceeded trough serum concentrations of 10 mg/L. For both agents, trough levels were similar in those who survived and those who died.Conclusions: Linezolid dosage at 600 mg every 12 h was adequate in the critically ill without need for adjustment for renal function. For teicoplanin, further study is needed to confirm if a trough of 10 mg/L is associated with a higher rate of cure than 5 mg/L. If so, serum drug assays would be needed to ensure a therapeutic level.