Clinical relevance of retrieval cues for attenuating context renewal of fear

Clinical relevance of retrieval cues for attenuating context renewal of fear
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.002
复制
发表时间:
2011-03-01
影响因子:
10.3
通讯作者:
Craske, Michelle G.
Craske, Michelle G.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Culver, Najwa C.;Stoyanova, Milena;Craske, Michelle G.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究探讨了提取线索(提醒对象)是否能减弱恐惧的情境更新。在研究1中,32名参与者在两种背景之一中完成了暴露;在新的或相同的背景下进行了为期1周的随访测试。结果表明,在一个新的背景下测试的人显着的恐惧更新。在第二项研究中,40名参与者在其中一种情况下完成了暴露;其中一半人给出了线索。一周后,所有人都在一个有或没有线索的新环境中接受了测试。结果表明弱衰减的上下文更新的参与者重新提出的线索。在研究3中,18名参与者在两个最大不同的环境中完成了暴露;所有的线索。一周后,参与者在一个有或没有线索的新环境中接受测试。结果表明无组间差异。这些发现表明,这组线索衰减上下文更新的临床相关性可能是有限的。(C)2010爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
The present studies investigated if retrieval cues (reminder objects) can attenuate context renewal of fear. In Study 1,32 participants completed exposure in one of two contexts; 1-week follow-up testing occurred in a novel or the same context. Results indicated significant renewal of fear for those tested in a novel context. In Study 2, 40 participants completed exposure in one of these contexts; half were presented with cues. One week later, all were tested in a novel context with or without cues. Results indicated weak attenuation of context renewal for participants re-presented with cues. In Study 3, 18 participants completed exposure in one of two maximally distinct contexts; all with cues. One week later, participants were tested in a novel context with or without cues. Results indicated no group differences. These findings suggest that clinical relevance of this set of cues for attenuating context renewal may be limited. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.