Collective action and subordinate group identity in a simulated society game
Collective action and subordinate group identity in a simulated society game
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-5584.2005.00268.x
复制
发表时间：
2005-03
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Y. Hirose;Yumiko Taresawa;Tatsuya Okuda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Hirose;Yumiko Taresawa;Tatsuya Okuda
：本研究通过使用模拟社会（SIMSOC）游戏，研究了群体间谈判背景下向上流动和资源差异对下属集体行动和群体认同的影响。根据社会认同理论，人们假设，当隶属群体的个人流动机会增加时，隶属群体的成员就不太可能参与集体行动并欣赏自己群体身份的优点。 454 名本科生参加了 12 场单独的 SIMSOC 比赛。每场比赛，大约 40 名本科生被分为主导组和从属组。向上流动程度高低和资源差距大小的四种组合各玩了三遍。与高流动性条件下的下属相比，低流动性条件下的下属更频繁地集体行动，对自己的团队的评价也更积极。研究发现，下属集体行动的频率与群体内偏袒之间存在显着的正相关关系。
: This research examined the effects of upward mobility and resource disparity on subordinates’ collective action and group identity in a context of intergroup negotiation by using a simulated society (SIMSOC) game. According to the social identity theory, it was hypothesized that when individual mobility opportunities for a subordinate group increase, the members of the subordinate group are less likely to participate in collective actions and to appreciate the merits of their own group identity. Four hundred and fifty-four undergraduates participated in 12 separate SIMSOC games. For each game, approximately 40 undergraduates were divided into dominant and subordinate groups. Each of the four combinations of high/low levels of upward mobility and large/small resource disparity was played out three times. Subordinates in the low-mobility condition acted collectively more frequently and evaluated their own group more positively than those in the high-mobility condition. A signifificant positive correlation between the frequency of subordinates’ collective action and in-group favoritism was found.