Gender Mainstreaming in a Development Project: Intersectionality in a Post-Colonial Un-doing?
Gender Mainstreaming in a Development Project: Intersectionality in a Post-Colonial Un-doing?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00454.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-03-01
影响因子：
5.8
通讯作者：
Baines, Donna
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baines, Donna
本文探讨了申请国际发展项目赠款的最早阶段的一些重要反思。虽然大部分资金来自北方，北方有可能重现典型的北南关系，但参与该项目的双方都同意以平等原则为基础建立关系，试图使关系非殖民化，或者可以被视为对传统殖民关系的一种“破坏”。在早期的会议上，团队内部和团队之间的紧张关系凸显了消除殖民关系的复杂性，以及殖民关系与性别、阶级和异性恋的个人和组织关系笨拙但无缝地交织在一起的方式。它还突出了在单一的国际机构或项目中改变霸权社会条件的混乱和困难。
This article explores some critical reflections engaged in as part of the earliest stages of applying for an international development project grant. Though most of the funding came from the North, which had the potential to reproduce typical North-South relations, both parties involved in the project agreed to predicate relationships on principles of equity in an attempt to decolonize relationships, or what could be seen as a sort of 'un-doing' of traditional colonial relations. Tensions emanating from within and among the teams at early meetings underscored the complexity of un-doing colonial relationships, as well as the way that colonial relations awkwardly but seamlessly intersect with gendered, classed and heteronormative individual and organizational relations. It also highlights the messiness and difficulty in transform(ing) hegemonic social conditions in a single international institution or project.