Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis
Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.002
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
11.3
通讯作者：
Yue Pan;J. Sparks
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yue Pan;J. Sparks
伦理判断作为伦理决策理论中的一个核心概念，已经成为一百多个实证研究的主题。尽管其规模，伦理判断文献似乎缺乏明确的三个领域。首先，实证结果有时不一致或相互矛盾的研究。其次，一系列广泛的不同的道德判断的措施引起了人们对研究有效性的关注。第三，样本组成的差异可能影响研究结果的可比性。为了帮助解决这些问题，本研究进行了审查和荟萃分析的伦理判断文献。结果提供了所有三个领域的见解。它们有助于解决道德判断和某些理论前因之间的关系的一些不一致;它们支持使用不同的道德判断的措施;它们提供了谨慎使用学生样本在道德判断研究。
As a central construct in theories of ethical decision making, ethical judgments have been the subject of more than one hundred empirical studies. Despite its size, the ethical judgments literature seems to lack clarity in three areas. First, empirical results are sometimes inconsistent or contradictory across studies. Second, a broad array of diverse measures of ethical judgments raises concerns about research validity. Third, differences in sample composition may affect comparability of study results. To help resolve these issues, this study conducts a review and meta-analysis of the ethical judgments literature. The results offer insights in all three areas. They help resolve some of the inconsistencies in the relationships between ethical judgments and certain theoretical antecedents; they support the use of diverse measures of ethical judgments; and they offer caution in the use of student samples in ethical judgments research.