Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/fampra/17.suppl_1.s11
复制
发表时间：
2000-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Steen, N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grimshaw, J;Campbell, M;Steen, N
指南实施研究的研究设计的选择将决定观察到的效果可归因于研究中的干预措施的置信度。一般来说，有不同类型的整群随机试验提供了最稳健的设计。然而，这些设计的使用对研究的功效、进行和分析有影响。在可能的情况下，应使用允许头对头比较的设计，其中包括性能的基线测量。
The choice of study design for guideline implementation studies will determine the confidence with which the observed effects can be attributed to the interventions under study. In general, cluster randomized trials, of which there are different types, provide the most robust design. However, the use of these designs has implications for the power, conduct and analysis of studies. Wherever possible, designs allowing head-to-head comparisons, which incorporate baseline measures of performance, should be used.