Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for Justice
Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for Justice
复制标题
名古屋议定书谈判：原住民对正义的要求
DOI：
10.1162/glep_a_00241
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya
2010年10月，《生物多样性公约》缔约方通过了《遗传资源获取以及利用遗传资源所产生惠益公正公平分享问题名古屋议定书》。《名古屋议定书》背后的一个推动力是解决全球对遗传资源的需求对土著人民和当地社区造成的不公正影响的任务，如丧失获得资源的机会、利用传统知识和剥夺资源权利。本文使用协作事件民族志，展示了国际法委员会正义话语在谈判中的有限性质、范围和参与，尽管《生物多样性公约》据称具有包容性。我把这种受约束的话语部分归因于司法元理论的存在，这一点通过司法文书的共同意义和规定性地位的出现得到了证明。
In October 2010, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization. One impetus behind the Nagoya Protocol was the mandate to address the unjust impacts—such as the loss of access to resources, exploitation of traditional knowledge, and expropriation of rights to resources—of the global demand for genetic resources on indigenous peoples and local communities (ILCs). Using collaborative event ethnography, this article demonstrates the limited nature, scope, and engagement of the ILC justice discourse in the negotiations, despite the supposedly inclusive nature of the CBD. I attribute the constrained discourse in part to the existence of a justice metanorm as evidenced through the emergence of shared meanings and prescriptive status of justice instruments.