Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members.
Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members.
复制标题
在所有错误的地方寻找真理？
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.229
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Thompson,EP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Trope,Y;Thompson,EP
两个实验研究了基于类别的期望（CBES）如何影响个性化的信息寻求时，试图作出准确的判断，对目标的态度，谁是社会类别的成员，强烈或微弱地暗示判断的态度。CBE在参与者问题的数量和内容上产生了明显的不对称。具体而言，参与者解决了较少的问题，刻板的目标（ST）比非刻板的目标（NST），从而获得相对较少的个性化信息ST判断之前。向ST提出的问题在诊断上是不对称的--回答可以更好地证实而不是否认预期的态度，但向NST提出的问题在诊断上是对称的--回答同样可以证实或否认态度。作者讨论了不对称搜索作为一种机制，可以保护CBE不受不确认的影响，而不依赖于对所获得信息的有偏见的处理。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Two experiments examined how category-based expectancies (CBEs) influence individuating information sought when trying to make accurate judgments about the attitudes of targets who were members of social categories that strongly or weakly implied the judged attitude. CBEs produced marked asymmetries in the number and content of participants' questions. Specifically, participants addressed fewer questions to stereotyped targets (STs) than to nonstereotyped targets (NSTs), thus acquiring relatively little individuating information about STs prior to judgment. Questions asked STs were diagnostically asymmetric—a response could better confirm than disconfirm the expected attitude, but questions to NSTs were diagnostically symmetric—a response could equally confirm or disconfirm the attitude. The authors discuss asymmetric search as a mechanism that may protect CBEs against disconfirmation independent of biased processing of acquired information.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)