Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation.
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/28621
复制
发表时间：
2022-01-24
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Schnall R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee J;Schnall R
Rigorous development of mobile technologies requires the use of validated instruments to evaluate the usability of these tools, which has become more relevant with the expansion of these technologies. Although various usability evaluation tools have been developed, there are relatively few simple evaluation instruments that have been validated across diseases and languages in mobile health (mHealth) information technology for use in multiple diseases. The purpose of this study is to validate the Korean version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Korean Health-ITUES) and assess its applicability for different health conditions. To develop the Korean Health-ITUES, we used a validation process involving the following 3 steps: (1) customization of the Health-ITUES for menstrual symptoms, (2) translation of the Health-ITUES from English into Korean, and (3) examination of the reliability and validity of the instrument. The translation process adhered to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for translation and back-translation, expert review, and reconciliation. The Korean Health-ITUES showed reliable internal consistency with Cronbach α=.951; meanwhile, factor loadings of the 20 items in the 4 subscales ranged from 0.416 to 0.892. The Health-ITUES demonstrated reliability and validity for its use in assessing mHealth apps’ usability in young Korean women with menstrual discomfort. Given the strong psychometric properties of this tool in Korean and English and across 2 different health conditions, the Health-ITUES is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the usability of mHealth apps. The Health-ITUES is also a valid instrument for evaluating mHealth technologies, which are widely used by patients to self-manage their health and by providers to improve health care delivery.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Kumar, Santosh;Nilsen, Wendy J.;Abernethy, Amy;Atienza, Audie;Patrick, Kevin;Pavel, Misha;Riley, William T.;Shar, Albert;Spring, Bonnie;Spruijt-Metz, Donna;Hedeker, Donald;Honavar, Vasant;Kravitz, Richard;Lefebvre, R. Craig;Mohr, David C.;Murphy, Susan A.;Quinn, Charlene;Shusterman, Vladimir;Swendeman, Dallas
通讯作者：
Swendeman, Dallas
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.012
发表时间：
2019-02-01
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Beauchemin, Melissa;Gradilla, Melissa;Schnall, Rebecca
通讯作者：
Schnall, Rebecca
影响因子：
105.7
作者：
Agarwal, Smisha;LeFevre, Amnesty E.;Labrique, Alain
通讯作者：
Labrique, Alain
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Grossman, Jason T.;Frumkin, Madelyn R.;Lenze, Eric J.
通讯作者：
Lenze, Eric J.
DOI：
10.1177/2055668320938604
发表时间：
2020-01
影响因子：
2
作者：
Faieta J;Hand BN;Schmeler M;Onate J;Digiovine C
通讯作者：
Digiovine C