Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/mnras/stz2197
复制
发表时间：
2018-11
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
S. Samuroff;J. Blazek;M. Troxel;N. MacCrann;E. Krause;C. D. Leonard;J. Prat;D. Gruen;S. Dodelson;T. Eifler;M. Gatti;W. Hartley;B. Hoyle;P. Larsen;J. Zuntz;T. Abbott;S. Allam;J. Annis;G. Bernstein;E. Bertin;S. Bridle;D. Brooks;A. Rosell;M. Kind;J. Carretero;F. Castander;C. Cunha;L. Costa;C. Davis;J. Vicente;D. Depoy;S. Desai;H. Diehl;J. Dietrich;P. Doel;B. Flaugher;P. Fosalba;J. Frieman;J. Garc'ia-Bellido;E. Gaztañaga;D. Gerdes;R. Gruendl;J. Gschwend;G. Gutiérrez;D. Hollowood;K. Honscheid;D. James;K. Kuehn;N. Kuropatkin;M. Lima;M. Maia;M. March;J. Marshall;P. Martini;Peter Melchior;F. Menanteau;C. Miller;R. Miquel;R. Ogando;A. Plazas;E. Sánchez;V. Scarpine;R. Schindler;M. Schubnell;S. Serrano;I. Sevilla-Noarbe;E. Sheldon;M. Smith;F. Sobreira;E. Suchyta;G. Tarlé;D. Thomas;V. Vikram
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Samuroff;J. Blazek;M. Troxel;N. MacCrann;E. Krause;C. D. Leonard;J. Prat;D. Gruen;S. Dodelson;T. Eifler;M. Gatti;W. Hartley;B. Hoyle;P. Larsen;J. Zuntz;T. Abbott;S. Allam;J. Annis;G. Bernstein;E. Bertin;S. Bridle;D. Brooks;A. Rosell;M. Kind;J. Carretero;F. Castander;C. Cunha;L. Costa;C. Davis;J. Vicente;D. Depoy;S. Desai;H. Diehl;J. Dietrich;P. Doel;B. Flaugher;P. Fosalba;J. Frieman;J. Garc'ia-Bellido;E. Gaztañaga;D. Gerdes;R. Gruendl;J. Gschwend;G. Gutiérrez;D. Hollowood;K. Honscheid;D. James;K. Kuehn;N. Kuropatkin;M. Lima;M. Maia;M. March;J. Marshall;P. Martini;Peter Melchior;F. Menanteau;C. Miller;R. Miquel;R. Ogando;A. Plazas;E. Sánchez;V. Scarpine;R. Schindler;M. Schubnell;S. Serrano;I. Sevilla-Noarbe;E. Sheldon;M. Smith;F. Sobreira;E. Suchyta;G. Tarlé;D. Thomas;V. Vikram
We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering, and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey. We define early- and late-type subsamples, which are found to pass a series of systematics tests, including for spurious photometric redshift error and point spread function correlations. We analyse these split data alongside the fiducial mixed Y1 sample using a range of intrinsic alignment models. In a fiducial non-linear alignment model analysis, assuming a flat Λ cold dark matter cosmology, we find a significant difference in intrinsic alignment amplitude, with early-type galaxies favouring $A_\mathrm{IA} = 2.38^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$ and late-type galaxies consistent with no intrinsic alignments at $0.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$. The analysis is repeated using a number of extended model spaces, including a physically motivated model that includes both tidal torquing and tidal alignment mechanisms. In multiprobe likelihood chains in which cosmology, intrinsic alignments in both galaxy samples and all other relevant systematics are varied simultaneously, we find the tidal alignment and tidal torquing parts of the intrinsic alignment signal have amplitudes $A_1 = 2.66 ^{+0.67}_{-0.66}$, $A_2=-2.94^{+1.94}_{-1.83}$, respectively, for early-type galaxies and $A_1 = 0.62 ^{+0.41}_{-0.41}$, $A_2 = -2.26^{+1.30}_{-1.16}$ for late-type galaxies. In the full (mixed) Y1 sample the best constraints are $A_1 = 0.70 ^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, $A_2 = -1.36 ^{+1.08}_{-1.41}$. For all galaxy splits and IA models considered, we report cosmological parameter constraints consistent with the results of the main DES Y1 cosmic shear and multiprobe cosmology papers.
We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering, and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey. We define early- and late-type subsamples, which are found to pass a series of systematics tests, including for spurious photometric redshift error and point spread function correlations. We analyse these split data alongside the fiducial mixed Y1 sample using a range of intrinsic alignment models. In a fiducial non-linear alignment model analysis, assuming a flat Λ cold dark matter cosmology, we find a significant difference in intrinsic alignment amplitude, with early-type galaxies favouring $A_\mathrm{IA} = 2.38^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$ and late-type galaxies consistent with no intrinsic alignments at $0.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$. The analysis is repeated using a number of extended model spaces, including a physically motivated model that includes both tidal torquing and tidal alignment mechanisms. In multiprobe likelihood chains in which cosmology, intrinsic alignments in both galaxy samples and all other relevant systematics are varied simultaneously, we find the tidal alignment and tidal torquing parts of the intrinsic alignment signal have amplitudes $A_1 = 2.66 ^{+0.67}_{-0.66}$, $A_2=-2.94^{+1.94}_{-1.83}$, respectively, for early-type galaxies and $A_1 = 0.62 ^{+0.41}_{-0.41}$, $A_2 = -2.26^{+1.30}_{-1.16}$ for late-type galaxies. In the full (mixed) Y1 sample the best constraints are $A_1 = 0.70 ^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, $A_2 = -1.36 ^{+1.08}_{-1.41}$. For all galaxy splits and IA models considered, we report cosmological parameter constraints consistent with the results of the main DES Y1 cosmic shear and multiprobe cosmology papers.