Disciplinary choices of mothers of deaf children and mothers of normally hearing children
Disciplinary choices of mothers of deaf children and mothers of normally hearing children
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.04.005
复制
发表时间：
2004-09-01
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Sullivan, PM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Knutson, JF;Johnson, CR;Sullivan, PM
目的：为了评估在测试儿童残疾和惩罚性养育之间的假设联系中，深度耳聋儿童和听力正常儿童的母亲的纪律偏好。方法：为重度失聪儿童寻求人工耳蜗植入的母亲（n = 57），不为失聪儿童寻求人工耳蜗植入的母亲（n = 22），和母亲的正常听力儿童（n = 27）进行了评估，使用模拟，任务中，受试者选择纪律，以回应幻灯片图像的儿童从事规范或坦率的偏差行为，是潜在的激怒。结果表明，有严重听力障碍的儿童的母亲更有可能选择身体纪律来应对所描述的儿童违规行为，并且更有可能升级到身体纪律，被描述为持续的海侵。此外，升级是更有可能在响应场景描绘儿童从事危险和破坏性的行为比在rule violating actions.Conclusions：调查结果是一致的，儿童残疾和虐待儿童之间的假设联系，以及与沟通问题相关的残疾儿童可能有身体虐待的风险。(C)2004爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Objective: To assess the disciplinary preferences of mothers of profoundly deaf children and normally hearing children in a test of the hypothesized link between child disabilities and punitive parenting.Method: Disciplinary preferences of mothers seeking a cochlear implant for their profoundly deaf child (n = 57), mothers not seeking an implant for their deaf child (n = 22), and mothers of normally hearing children (n = 27) were assessed using an analog, task in which subjects select discipline in response to slide images of children engaging in normative or frankly deviant behaviors that are potentially irritating.Results: Results indicated that mothers of children with profound hearing impairments were more likely to select physical discipline in response to depicted child transgressions and more likely to escalate to physical discipline when the depicted child was described as persisting in the transgression. Additionally, escalation was more probable in response to scenes depicting children engaged in dangerous and destructive acts than in rule-violating acts.Conclusions: Findings were consistent with the hypothesized link between childhood disabilities and child maltreatment as well as the hypothesis that children with disabilities associated with communication problems could be at risk of physical abuse. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.