Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: what if it works?
Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: what if it works?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61053-8
复制
发表时间:
2007-07-07
期刊:
影响因子:
168.9
通讯作者:
Jaffe, Harold W.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Paxton, Lynn A.;Hope, Tony;Jaffe, Harold W.
For all the advances in treatment of HIV infection, the mainstays of prevention have changed little: sexual abstinence, condoms, sterile injection equipment, avoidance of high-risk behaviours, and knowing one’s own serostatus and that of any sexual or drug-injecting partners. Although these strategies can be effective and recent years have seen decreases in new infections in some countries and in some risk groups, the 11 000 new infections daily is ample testament that additional methods of prevention are needed. 1 Evidence for successful HIV-prevention technologies is mixed. Randomised studies of male circumcision in South Africa, Kenya, and Uganda were discontinued early after interim review showed reductions in new HIV infections ranging from 60% to 74% in the circumcised men compared with those who were not circumcised. 2–4 Several topical microbicides are in advanced trials. However, phase III trials of C-31G (originally developed by Cellegy Pharmaceuticals) and cellulose sulphate (Polydex Pharmaceuticals, Nassau, Bahamas) were terminated early because preliminary results suggested no efficacy (C-31G) 5 or increased risk of HIV transmission (cellulose sulphate). 6 HIV-vaccine research continues despite two completed trials of AidsVax (VaxGen, South San Francisco, CA, USA) that showed no efficacy. 7, 8 Proof of efficacy of any present microbicide or vaccine candidate is several years away, and first products will probably be only moderately effective. The need to manufacture such a product in large quantities and distribute it around the world will pose additional challenges. 9, 10