A qualitative analysis of participant experiences with universal school-based depression screening.
A qualitative analysis of participant experiences with universal school-based depression screening.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102073
复制
发表时间:
2023-02
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Stuckey, Heather
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sekhar, Deepa L.;Hivner, Elizabeth;Molinari, Alissa;Allen, Kathleen;Stuckey, Heather
School-based depression screening was well-received by participating communities. The main barrier was adequate staffing to manage screening referrals. Schools planning implementation need support focused on anticipated challenges. Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate and Lower Depression (SHIELD) was a randomized clinical trial of school-based universal depression screening conducted with public high schools in Pennsylvania, United States. Screened adolescents were twice as likely to initiate depression treatment compared to peers who were not screened. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the experience of communities participating in universal screening via SHIELD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with school staff (n = 11), parents (n = 4) and adolescents (n = 7) from April-October 2021. A codebook was developed with 20 % of audio transcripts coded for inter-rater reliability (staff k = 0.88, parents k = 0.90, adolescent k = 0.74). The two coders divided and individually coded remaining transcripts for thematic content analysis. Three themes were identified: 1) Depression screening was well-received; 2) The main challenge with screening was inadequate staffing to manage referrals; and 3) School staff suggested alternate formats and methods for future screening. In summary, school-based depression screening was well-received, but schools experienced challenges with staffing and resources to support identified adolescents and offered alternative suggestions for future screening. Schools interested in depression screening need education and capacity building focused on barriers and challenges with the process. Learning from staff who have realized this evidence-based practice in their respective districts will support next steps towards implementation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jones SE;Ethier KA;Hertz M;DeGue S;Le VD;Thornton J;Lim C;Dittus PJ;Geda S
通讯作者:
Geda S
影响因子:
8
作者:
Irwin, Charles E., Jr.;Adams, Sally H.;Newacheck, Paul W.
通讯作者:
Newacheck, Paul W.
影响因子:
26.1
作者:
Racine, Nicole;McArthur, Brae Anne;Madigan, Sheri
通讯作者:
Madigan, Sheri
影响因子:
2
作者:
Sandelowski, Margarete
通讯作者:
Sandelowski, Margarete
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Sekhar, Deepa L.;Gebremariam, Acham;Clark, Sarah J.
通讯作者:
Clark, Sarah J.