Did Users Co-create Innovation in Smart City Initiatives? A Case in Japan
Did Users Co-create Innovation in Smart City Initiatives? A Case in Japan
复制标题
用户是否共同创造了智慧城市计划的创新？
DOI：
10.1142/9789811257186_0006
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yamashita Jun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
井上 孝;和田 光平;青木佳音・井良沢道也・福留邦洋;Yamashita Jun
自从吉布森等人[1992]创造了“智慧城市”一词，智慧城市的理论和实践蓬勃发展。关于理论方面，随着智慧城市发展数量的蓬勃发展，智慧城市的定义变得更加多样化[白化病等人，2015; Lazaroiu和Roscia，2012]。在这些不同的定义中，Caragliu et al. [2009年]认为，“智慧城市的前提是对人力和社会资本以及传统（交通）和现代（信通技术）通信基础设施的投资能够推动可持续经济增长和高质量生活，并通过参与式治理对自然资源进行明智的管理”[第50页]。根据这一定义，包括公民参与在内的参与式治理被视为智慧城市概念的一部分。在智慧城市创新生态系统的框架内，不仅可以实现可持续的经济增长和高质量的生活，而且也是智慧城市概念的一部分的用户驱动创新理论也得到了发展。虽然将智慧城市定义为“开放和用户驱动的环境”，
Since Gibson et al.[1992] coined the term ‘smart city’, theories and practices of smart cities have flourished. Regarding the theoretical aspect, definitions of a smart city have become more diverse as the number of smart city developments has flourished [Albino et al., 2015; Lazaroiu and Roscia, 2012]. Among such diverse definitions, Caragliu et al.[2009] considered “a city to be smart when investments in human and social capital and traditional (transport) and modern (ICT) communication infrastructure fuel sustainable economic growth and a high quality of life, with a wise management of natural resources, through participatory governance”[p. 50]. According to this definition, participatory governance, including citizens’ participation, is regarded as a part of the smart city concept.Following the aforementioned definition, theories on user-driven innovation, which not only leads to sustainable economic growth and a high quality of life but is also a part of the smart city concept, have been developed within the framework of smart city innovation ecosystems. While defining a smart city as “environments of open and user-driven