Size-dependent fracture toughness of bulk-metallic glasses
Size-dependent fracture toughness of bulk-metallic glasses
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.062
复制
发表时间:
2014-05
期刊:
影响因子:
9.4
通讯作者:
B. Gludovatz;S. Naleway;R. Ritchie;J. Kruzic
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Gludovatz;S. Naleway;R. Ritchie;J. Kruzic
The fracture toughness is a critical material property that determines engineering performance. However, as is well known for crystalline materials, if certain sample geometry and size requirements are not met, test results become sample-size dependent and difficult to compare between different studies. Here, the room-temperature fracture toughness of the Zr-based bulk metallic glass (BMG) Zr52.5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10Ti5(Vitreloy 105) was evaluated using compact-tension, as well as single-edge notched-bend, specimens of different sizes to measureKIcvalues according to ASTM standard E399 andJIcvalues according to ASTM standard E1820. It is concluded that the ASTM standard E399 sample-size requirements should be cautiously accepted as providing size-independent (valid)KIcresults for BMGs; however, it is also concluded that small-sized samples may result in a wider scatter in conditional toughnessKQvalues, a smaller yield of valid tests and possibly somewhat elevated toughness values. Such behavior is distinct from crystalline metals where the size requirements of ASTM standard E399 are quite conservative. For BMGs,KQvalues increase and show a larger scatter with decreasing uncracked ligament widthb, which is also distinct from crystalline metals. Samples smaller than required by ASTM standards forKIctesting are allowed by theJ-integral-based standard E1820; however, in this study on BMGs, such tests were found to give significantly higher toughness values as compared to validKIcresults. Overall, the toughness behavior of BMGs is more sensitive to size requirements than for crystalline metals, an observation that is likely related to the distinct size-dependent bending ductility and strain softening behavior found for metallic glasses. It is concluded that toughness values measured on BMG samples smaller than that required by theKIcstandard, which are common in the literature, are likely sample size- and geometry-dependent, even when they meet the less restrictive validJIcrequirements.