Prevalence and reliability of self-reported authorship disclosures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Prevalence and reliability of self-reported authorship disclosures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.otohns.2009.06.010
复制
发表时间：
2009-09-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Lin, Harrison W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bhattacharyya, Neil;Lin, Harrison W.
目的：确定美国耳鼻喉科-头颈外科基金会 (AAO-HNSF) 赞助的演讲和出版物中潜在利益冲突的自我报告作者身份披露的可靠性。研究设计/设置：学术中心的回顾性队列研究。方法：演讲者在 2006 年和 2007 年 AAO-HNSF 年会上自我报告的披露是制成表格。 《耳鼻喉头颈外科》杂志上与这些演讲相关的后续出版物根据出版时披露的信息进行了分析。年会披露和出版物印刷披露之间的差异是根据作者和演示文稿/论文确定的。计算可靠性统计数据以确定披露报告的一致性，并根据差异对潜在利益冲突进行分析。结果：在年会级别确定了 578 名演讲者的披露，最终导致 153 份期刊出版物。共有 51 位作者 (8.8%) 发现披露报告存在差异（32 位作者：1 个差异；11 位作者：2 个差异；8 位作者：3 个或更多差异）。总体而言，每位作者的平均差异为 0.14（95% 置信区间：0.10-0.19 差异）。按发表情况分析，39 篇论文 (25.5%) 包含作者之间的一项或多项披露差异，范围从 1 个差异（占论文的 11.8%）到 9 个差异（0.7%）不等，平均每篇论文有 2.1 个作者身份披露差异。结论：在耳鼻喉科领域，作者披露的内容在发表时间和随后发表时间之间存在很大差异。尽管这些差异可能存在合理的原因，但对这些差异的分析对于利益冲突的确定非常重要。 (C) 2009 年美国耳鼻喉科学会-头颈外科基金会。版权所有。
OBJECTIVE: Determine reliability of self-reported authorship disclosures of potential conflicts of interest in American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF)-sponsored presentations and publications.STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study at academic center.METHODS: Presenters' self-reported disclosures made at the AAO-HNSF annual meeting for calendar years 2006 and 2007 were tabulated. Subsequent publications related to these presentations in the journal Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery were analyzed with respect to disclosures revealed at the time of publication. Discrepancies between annual meeting disclosures and publication print disclosures were identified according to author and presentation/paper. Reliability statistics were computed to determine consistency of disclosure reporting and an analysis of potential conflicts of interest according to discrepancies was performed.RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-eight presenters' disclosures were identified at the annual meeting level, which ultimately led to 153 journal publications. A total of 51 authors (8.8%) with disclosure reporting discrepancies were identified (32 authors: one discrepancy; 11 authors: two discrepancies; eight authors: three or more discrepancies). Overall, a mean of 0.14 discrepancies per author (95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.19 discrepancies) was noted. Analyzed by publication, 39 papers (25.5%) contained one or more disclosure discrepancies among authors, ranging from one discrepancy (11.8% of papers) to nine discrepancies (0.7%), with an average of 2.1 authorship disclosure discrepancies per paper.CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of authors' disclosures differ between time of presentation and subsequent publication within otolaryngology. Although valid reasons for these discrepancies may exist, analysis of these discrepancies is important for conflict-of-interest determination. (C) 2009 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.