Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: A meta-analysis
Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10567-005-2340-z
复制
发表时间：
2005-03-01
影响因子：
6.9
通讯作者：
Kuhni, BR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Larzelere, RE;Kuhni, BR
这项荟萃分析调查了26项合格研究中体罚和替代纪律策略对儿童结局的影响大小之间的差异。分析效应量的差异可以减少系统性偏差，并强调父母必须选择的纪律策略之间的直接比较。结果表明，效果大小显着有利于有条件的打屁股超过10的13个替代纪律策略，以减少儿童不遵守或反社会行为。除了一项支持体罚的大型研究外，习惯性体罚产生的效应大小与替代策略相等。只有过于严厉或主要使用体罚相比，不利的替代纪律策略。讨论突出表明，需要更好地区分一般纪律处罚的有效使用和适得其反的使用。
This meta-analysis investigates differences between the effect sizes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics for child outcomes in 26 qualifying studies. Analyzing differences in effect sizes reduces systematic biases and emphasizes direct comparisons between the disciplinary tactics that parents have to select among. The results indicated that effect sizes significantly favored conditional spanking over 10 of 13 alternative disciplinary tactics for reducing child noncompliance or antisocial behavior. Customary physical punishment yielded effect sizes equal to alternative tactics, except for one large study favoring physical punishment. Only overly severe or predominant use of physical punishment compared unfavorably with alternative disciplinary tactics. The discussion highlights the need for better discriminations between effective and counterproductive use of disciplinary punishment in general.