The NATO STO AVT-201 Task Group on ExtendedAssessment of Stability and Control PredictionMethods for NATO Air Vehicles: Summary, Conclusions and Lessons Learned
The NATO STO AVT-201 Task Group on ExtendedAssessment of Stability and Control PredictionMethods for NATO Air Vehicles: Summary, Conclusions and Lessons Learned
复制标题
北约 STO AVT-201 北约飞行器稳定性和控制预测方法扩展评估工作组：总结、结论和经验教训
DOI：
10.2514/6.2014-2394
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
K. C. Huber
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Jirásek;R. Cummings;A. Schütte;K. C. Huber
本文介绍了北约STO AVT-201北约空中和海上飞行器任务组可靠稳定性和控制预测方法扩展评估中获得的结果的交叉比较。五个参与组织和六个
将不同的计算流体动力学解算器与DNW-NWB风洞在低马赫数下获得的静态和动态风洞数据进行了比较。这些比较有助于发现通用UCAV SACCON空气动力学CFD预测的共性和差异，并指出CFD受到非线性空气动力学气流预测挑战的领域。这些比较有助于显示建模和
在设计开发的最早阶段对新型飞机平台进行仿真，可以通过确定困难的非线性空气动力学，并有助于在设计过程的后期阶段之前改变设计，从而有助于更成功的设计过程。
This article presents cross-comparisons of the results obtained within the NATO STO AVT-201 Extended Assessment of Reliable Stability & Control Prediction Method for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles Task Group. The results of five participating organizations and six
different CFD solvers are compared to the available wind tunnel data from the DNW-NWB wind tunnel obtained at low Mach number, for both static and dynamic cases. The comparisons help to find commonalities and disparities in the CFD predictions of the aerodynamics of a generic UCAV, SACCON, and point to areas where CFD is challenged by non-linear aerodynamics ow prediction. These comparisons help to show where the modeling and
simulation of novel aircraft platforms in the earliest stages of design development can contribute to a more successful design process by determining diffcult non-linear aerodynamics and helping to change the design prior to the later stages of the design process.