Pathway of adaptation to community relocation: Prospects and limitations of community-centred planning
Pathway of adaptation to community relocation: Prospects and limitations of community-centred planning
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102582
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Kensuke Tsubouchi;T. Okada;Suguru Mori
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kensuke Tsubouchi;T. Okada;Suguru Mori
本文以2011年东日本大地震后，在当地居民的积极参与下实施搬迁计划的小泉地区为例，探讨了从规划到安置的长期恢复过程。通过访谈调查和使用路径框架，解释了社区恢复过程的路径，本研究表明，在当地居民的制度化的逐步转变，推进项目从为社区，为项目的实施，不可避免地影响了社区的能力，尽管通过和存在的社区为中心的方法，在恢复工作的步骤。采用以社区为中心的办法可能会在考虑到当地社区的情况下制定搬迁规划，但也有人担心，这将不可避免地以公共政策的形式在社区内获得权威。换句话说，制度化可能不仅发生在城市规划工作使社区边缘化的情况下，甚至在规划过程中有意并表现出以社区为中心的情况下。我们认为，以社区为中心，需要更好地了解其局限性，以便更实际的讨论其潜力可以发展。
This paper explores the long-term recovery process from planning to resettlement in the case of community relocation in the Koizumi district, which implemented relocation programme with a strong initiative of local residents against the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Through interview investigations and using pathway framework which explained the community recovery process as pathway, this study shows that the gradual shift in institutionalisation of local residents progressing the project fromfor the communitytofor the projectimplicitly and inevitably has affected the community's capacity despite the adoption and presence of a community-centred approach in the steps of the recovery efforts. The application of the community-centred approach may frame the relocation planning in consideration of the local community, but there is also a concern that it will inevitably gain authority within the community in the form of public policy. In other words, institutionalisation may not only occur when town planning efforts marginalise the community, but even when community-centring is intended and demonstrated in the planning process. We argue that community-centredness requires better understanding of its limitation so that more practical discussions about its potential can develop.