Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review.
Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review.
复制标题
针对智力和发育障碍人士的高科技和低技术选项的要求模式偏好评估：系统审查。
DOI：
10.1007/s40617-023-00829-6
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Ringdahl,JoelE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O'Brien,MatthewJ;Pauls,AlexanderM;Schieltz,KellyM;McComas,JenniferJ;Ringdahl,JoelE
现有文献表明，当有多种沟通方式可用并按照相同的强化计划产生强化时，智力和发育障碍（IDD）个体会表现出对沟通方式的偏好。通常建议声音沟通技巧有限的个人使用高科技和低技术的通信选项，例如语音输出设备和图片卡。在这项研究中，我们对实施要求模式偏好评估 (MMPA) 的研究进行了系统的文献综述，其中包括与 IDD 患者的高科技和低技术沟通选项。我们确定了 27 项符合纳入标准的研究，并总结了参与者的人口统计数据、MMPA 设计和程序变化以及 MMPA 结果。结果表明，高科技通信选项通常比低技术选项更受青睐。然而，研究的进行方式和结论的得出存在很大程度的差异。我们讨论了当前的一些研究差距及其对临床实践的影响。
The extant literature demonstrates that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) exhibit preferences among communication modalities when multiple modalities are available and produce reinforcement on identical reinforcement schedules. High- and low-tech communication options, such as voice output devices and picture cards, are commonly recommended for individuals with limited vocal communication skills. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review of research studies that implemented mand modality preference assessments (MMPAs) that included both a high- and low-tech communication option with individuals with IDD. We identified 27 studies meeting our inclusion criteria and summarized the participant demographics, MMPA design and procedural variations, and MMPA outcomes. The results suggested that high-tech communication options were generally more preferred over low-tech options. However, there was a high degree of variability in how the studies were conducted and conclusions were reached. We discuss some of the current research gaps and the implications for clinical practice.